Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Sep 2, 2022. It is now read-only.

8262844: (fs) FileStore.supportsFileAttributeView might return false negative in case of ext3 #80

Closed

Conversation

RealCLanger
Copy link
Contributor

@RealCLanger RealCLanger commented Mar 11, 2021


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • Change must be properly reviewed

Issue

  • JDK-8262844: (fs) FileStore.supportsFileAttributeView might return false negative in case of ext3

Download

$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk16u pull/80/head:pull/80
$ git checkout pull/80

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Mar 11, 2021

👋 Welcome back clanger! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title Backport 8d3de4b1bdb5dc13bb7724596dc2123ba05bbb81 8262844: (fs) FileStore.supportsFileAttributeView might return false negative in case of ext3 Mar 11, 2021
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 11, 2021

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 11, 2021

@RealCLanger This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8262844: (fs) FileStore.supportsFileAttributeView might return false negative in case of ext3

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been no new commits pushed to the master branch. If another commit should be pushed before you perform the /integrate command, your PR will be automatically rebased. If you prefer to avoid any potential automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Mar 11, 2021
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Mar 11, 2021

Webrevs

@RealCLanger
Copy link
Contributor Author

/integrate

@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Mar 22, 2021
@openjdk openjdk bot added integrated Pull request has been integrated and removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Mar 22, 2021
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 22, 2021

@RealCLanger Since your change was applied there have been 10 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 34ecf72: 8263069: Exclude some failing tests from security/infra/java/security/cert/CertPathValidator
  • b64af94: 8261505: Test test/hotspot/jtreg/gc/parallel/TestDynShrinkHeap.java killed by Linux OOM Killer
  • c1ef397: 8260236: better init AnnotationCollector _contended_group
  • 2c6b47c: 8263030: Remove Shenandoah leftovers from ReferenceProcessor
  • 71102e7: 8263136: C4530 was reported from VS 2019 at access bridge
  • db7b1c9: 8263430: Uninitialized Method* variables after JDK-8233913
  • 0aeeebb: 8263557: Possible NULL dereference in Arena::destruct_contents()
  • 7ba457a: 8262829: Native crash in Win32PrintServiceLookup.getAllPrinterNames()
  • 86a970d: 8262446: DragAndDrop hangs on Windows
  • 6905591: 8261914: IfNode::fold_compares_helper faces non-canonicalized bool when running JRuby JSON workload

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

Pushed as commit 62adf83.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@RealCLanger RealCLanger deleted the 8262844-filestore-support branch March 23, 2021 16:37
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
backport clean integrated Pull request has been integrated
1 participant