Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Sep 2, 2022. It is now read-only.
/ jdk17 Public archive

8270307: C2: assert(false) failed: bad AD file after JDK-8267687 #254

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

y1yang0
Copy link
Member

@y1yang0 y1yang0 commented Jul 19, 2021

One input of ConvI2L becomes Top, which causes all nodes in the chain becoming Top, but this CMoveLNode does not change, only its input becomes Top.

  Pop  2146  CMoveL  === _  351  1  2149  [[ 2182  2187 ]]   Type:long !orig=810,696,[439],288 !jvms: Test::vMeth @ bci:78 (line 8)
BreakAtNode: _idx=2461 _debug_idx=102702461 orig._idx=2146 orig._debug_idx=92502146
<               < 2146  CMoveL  === _ _  1 _  [[]]   Type:long !orig=810,696,[439],288 !jvms: Test::vMeth @ bci:78 (line 8)
> long           2461  CMoveL  === _  2458  2149  1  [[ 2187  2182 ]]   Type:long !orig=2146,810,696,[439],288 !jvms: Test::vMeth @ bci:78 (line 8)

This CMoveLNode(CMove Binary(.. ..) (Binary .. Con#Top)) can not match any rules in the instruction selection phase and finally hits the assert. The proposed fix disables further optimizations if inputs of CMoveNode are type of Top.

Testing:

  • test/hotspot/jtreg/compiler/c2
  • github presubmit tests
  • attached fuzzer test
  • TestCMoveHasTopInput

Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • Change must be properly reviewed

Issue

  • JDK-8270307: C2: assert(false) failed: bad AD file after JDK-8267687

Reviewers

Contributors

  • Kuai Wei <kuaiwei.kw@alibaba-inc.com>

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk17 pull/254/head:pull/254
$ git checkout pull/254

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/254
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk17 pull/254/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 254

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 254

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk17/pull/254.diff

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jul 19, 2021

👋 Welcome back yyang! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Jul 19, 2021
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 19, 2021

@kelthuzadx The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot-compiler

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the hotspot-compiler hotspot-compiler-dev@openjdk.java.net label Jul 19, 2021
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Jul 19, 2021

Webrevs

Copy link
Contributor

@vnkozlov vnkozlov left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 19, 2021

@kelthuzadx This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8270307: C2: assert(false) failed: bad AD file after JDK-8267687

Co-authored-by: Kuai Wei <kuaiwei.kw@alibaba-inc.com>
Reviewed-by: kvn, thartmann

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 1 new commit pushed to the master branch:

  • c130451: 8269752: C2: assert(false) failed: Bad graph detected in build_loop_late

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Jul 19, 2021
Copy link
Member

@TobiHartmann TobiHartmann left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me.

@y1yang0
Copy link
Member Author

y1yang0 commented Jul 20, 2021

Thanks Vladimir and Tobias for reviews!

@y1yang0
Copy link
Member Author

y1yang0 commented Jul 20, 2021

/contributor add Kuai Wei kuaiwei.kw@alibaba-inc.com

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 20, 2021

@kelthuzadx
Contributor Kuai Wei <kuaiwei.kw@alibaba-inc.com> successfully added.

@y1yang0
Copy link
Member Author

y1yang0 commented Jul 20, 2021

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 20, 2021

Going to push as commit 0cec11d.
Since your change was applied there has been 1 commit pushed to the master branch:

  • c130451: 8269752: C2: assert(false) failed: Bad graph detected in build_loop_late

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Jul 20, 2021
@openjdk openjdk bot added integrated Pull request has been integrated and removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Jul 20, 2021
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 20, 2021

@kelthuzadx Pushed as commit 0cec11d.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@y1yang0 y1yang0 deleted the bad_file branch July 20, 2021 06:11
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
hotspot-compiler hotspot-compiler-dev@openjdk.java.net integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants