Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner. It is now read-only.

8271863: ProblemList serviceability/sa/TestJmapCore.java on linux-x64 with ZGC #302

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Conversation

dcubed-ojdk
Copy link
Member

@dcubed-ojdk dcubed-ojdk commented Aug 5, 2021


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8271863: ProblemList serviceability/sa/TestJmapCore.java on linux-x64 with ZGC

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk17 pull/302/head:pull/302
$ git checkout pull/302

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/302
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk17 pull/302/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 302

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 302

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk17/pull/302.diff

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

@bridgekeeper bridgekeeper bot commented Aug 5, 2021

👋 Welcome back dcubed! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title Backport a007cb1a1dd6a716555031c271cb11f4980813e7 8271863: ProblemList serviceability/sa/TestJmapCore.java on linux-x64 with ZGC Aug 5, 2021
@openjdk
Copy link

@openjdk openjdk bot commented Aug 5, 2021

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

@openjdk
Copy link

@openjdk openjdk bot commented Aug 5, 2021

@dcubed-ojdk This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8271863: ProblemList serviceability/sa/TestJmapCore.java on linux-x64 with ZGC

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been no new commits pushed to the master branch. If another commit should be pushed before you perform the /integrate command, your PR will be automatically rebased. If you prefer to avoid any potential automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added ready rfr labels Aug 5, 2021
@dcubed-ojdk
Copy link
Member Author

@dcubed-ojdk dcubed-ojdk commented Aug 5, 2021

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

@openjdk openjdk bot commented Aug 5, 2021

Going to push as commit f312f28.

@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Aug 5, 2021
@openjdk openjdk bot added integrated and removed ready rfr labels Aug 5, 2021
@openjdk
Copy link

@openjdk openjdk bot commented Aug 5, 2021

@dcubed-ojdk Pushed as commit f312f28.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@openjdk
Copy link

@openjdk openjdk bot commented Aug 5, 2021

@dcubed-ojdk To determine the appropriate audience for reviewing this pull request, one or more labels corresponding to different subsystems will normally be applied automatically. However, no automatic labelling rule matches the changes in this pull request. In order to have an "RFR" email sent to the correct mailing list, you will need to add one or more applicable labels manually using the /label pull request command.

Applicable Labels
  • 2d
  • awt
  • beans
  • build
  • compiler
  • core-libs
  • hotspot
  • hotspot-compiler
  • hotspot-gc
  • hotspot-jfr
  • hotspot-runtime
  • i18n
  • ide-support
  • javadoc
  • jdk
  • jmx
  • kulla
  • net
  • nio
  • security
  • serviceability
  • shenandoah
  • sound
  • swing

@dcubed-ojdk dcubed-ojdk deleted the JDK-8271863 branch Aug 5, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
backport clean integrated
2 participants