Skip to content

Conversation

@rvansa
Copy link
Contributor

@rvansa rvansa commented Jan 31, 2023

Technically not clean, changed Java versions in test (separate commit)


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8296329: jar validator doesn't account for minor class file version

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev pull/1132/head:pull/1132
$ git checkout pull/1132

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/1132
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev pull/1132/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 1132

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 1132

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/1132.diff

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jan 31, 2023

👋 Welcome back rvansa! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title Backport faf48e61be4f97f725b053aa351d3c64638546bf 8296329: jar validator doesn't account for minor class file version Jan 31, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 31, 2023

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

@openjdk openjdk bot added backport Port of a pull request already in a different code base rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Jan 31, 2023
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Jan 31, 2023

Webrevs

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 2, 2023

@rvansa Please do not rebase or force-push to an active PR as it invalidates existing review comments. Note for future reference, the bots always squash all changes into a single commit automatically as part of the integration. See OpenJDK Developers’ Guide for more information.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 2, 2023

@rvansa This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8296329: jar validator doesn't account for minor class file version

Reviewed-by: yan

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 8 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 83c0805: 8289948: Improve test coverage for XPath functions: Node Set Functions
  • b9e4d10: 8289440: Remove vmTestbase/nsk/monitoring/MemoryPoolMBean/isCollectionUsageThresholdExceeded/isexceeded003 from ProblemList.txt
  • c9fac0e: 8282036: Change java/util/zip/ZipFile/DeleteTempJar.java to stop HttpServer cleanly in case of exceptions
  • 535c64b: 8209935: Test to cover CodeSource.getCodeSigners()
  • 62461a2: 8271838: AmazonCA.java interop test fails
  • 71f53ad: 8286154: Fix 3rd party notices in test files
  • 49a0287: 6779701: Wrong defect ID in the code of test LocalRMIServerSocketFactoryTest.java
  • 501a4bf: 8298649: JFR: RemoteRecordingStream support for checkpoint event sizes beyond u4

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@yan-too) but any other Committer may sponsor as well.

➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type /integrate in a new comment. (Afterwards, your sponsor types /sponsor in a new comment to perform the integration).

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Feb 2, 2023
@rvansa
Copy link
Contributor Author

rvansa commented Feb 2, 2023

/integrate

@openjdk openjdk bot added the sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored label Feb 2, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 2, 2023

@rvansa
Your change (at version 0baa468) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

@yan-too
Copy link

yan-too commented Feb 2, 2023

integrate is too early here, let's wait for maintainer's jdk17u-fix-yes

@yan-too
Copy link

yan-too commented Feb 6, 2023

/sponsor

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 6, 2023

Going to push as commit 4ab869e.
Since your change was applied there have been 20 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • ceabaee: 8300590: [JVMCI] BytecodeFrame.equals is broken
  • ddd9631: 8294677: chunklevel::MAX_CHUNK_WORD_SIZE too small for some applications
  • 0ed3689: 8299194: CustomTzIDCheckDST.java may fail at future date
  • 2fa09bb: 8290836: Improve test coverage for XPath functions: String Functions
  • fe770e3: 8299296: Write a test to verify the components selection sends ItemEvent
  • 38eb0d6: 8293326: jdk/sun/security/tools/jarsigner/compatibility/SignTwice.java slow on Windows
  • 012a216: 8289400: Improve com/sun/jdi/TestScaffold error reporting
  • c74eb2b: 8292066: Convert TestInputArgument.sh and TestSystemLoadAvg.sh to java version
  • 78c6be2: 8292443: Weak CAS VarHandle/Unsafe tests should test always-failing cases
  • 50c3433: 8291825: java/time/nontestng/java/time/zone/CustomZoneNameTest.java fails if defaultLocale and defaultFormatLocale are different
  • ... and 10 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/compare/9a992abfdb29fda57d0b8d97dab38ee95bb600b5...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Feb 6, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Feb 6, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored labels Feb 6, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 6, 2023

@yan-too @rvansa Pushed as commit 4ab869e.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

backport Port of a pull request already in a different code base integrated Pull request has been integrated

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants