-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 208
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8292301: [REDO v2] C2 crash when allocating array of size too large #1204
Conversation
👋 Welcome back goetz! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit. |
77aad84
to
d250f3a
Compare
@GoeLin Please do not rebase or force-push to an active PR as it invalidates existing review comments. Note for future reference, the bots always squash all changes into a single commit automatically as part of the integration. See OpenJDK Developers’ Guide for more information. |
@rwestrel Hi! Could you please help review this? Thanks! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good to me.
@GoeLin This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 3 new commits pushed to the
Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the detailed description! Backport looks correct to me.
/integrate |
Going to push as commit cc170c7.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
I had to resolve three files:
src/hotspot/share/opto/callnode.cpp
AllocateArrayNode::Ideal could not be deleted automatically.
The patch removes igvn->add_input_to(phase->C->root(), halt);
but 11 has phase->C->root()->add_req(halt);
Just deleted anyways.
src/hotspot/share/opto/loopopts.cpp
In the source, clone_loop() has been refactored.
The patch touches code moved to finish_clone_loop().
The very same code is in clone_loop() in 17. Moved
hunk there.
src/hotspot/share/opto/phaseX.cpp
Just placement of a comment.
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev pull/1204/head:pull/1204
$ git checkout pull/1204
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/1204
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev pull/1204/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 1204
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 1204
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/1204.diff