Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8292301: [REDO v2] C2 crash when allocating array of size too large #1204

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

GoeLin
Copy link
Member

@GoeLin GoeLin commented Mar 16, 2023

I had to resolve three files:
src/hotspot/share/opto/callnode.cpp
AllocateArrayNode::Ideal could not be deleted automatically.
The patch removes igvn->add_input_to(phase->C->root(), halt);
but 11 has phase->C->root()->add_req(halt);
Just deleted anyways.

src/hotspot/share/opto/loopopts.cpp
In the source, clone_loop() has been refactored.
The patch touches code moved to finish_clone_loop().
The very same code is in clone_loop() in 17. Moved
hunk there.

src/hotspot/share/opto/phaseX.cpp
Just placement of a comment.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8292301: [REDO v2] C2 crash when allocating array of size too large

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev pull/1204/head:pull/1204
$ git checkout pull/1204

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/1204
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev pull/1204/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 1204

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 1204

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/1204.diff

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Mar 16, 2023

👋 Welcome back goetz! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title Backport 1ea0d6b424c263590fd145913280a180d7ce5fe1 8292301: [REDO v2] C2 crash when allocating array of size too large Mar 16, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 16, 2023

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

@openjdk openjdk bot added backport rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Mar 16, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 16, 2023

@GoeLin Please do not rebase or force-push to an active PR as it invalidates existing review comments. Note for future reference, the bots always squash all changes into a single commit automatically as part of the integration. See OpenJDK Developers’ Guide for more information.

@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Mar 16, 2023

Webrevs

@jerboaa
Copy link
Contributor

jerboaa commented Mar 16, 2023

@rwestrel Hi! Could you please help review this? Thanks!

Copy link
Contributor

@rwestrel rwestrel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 16, 2023

@GoeLin This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8292301: [REDO v2] C2 crash when allocating array of size too large

Reviewed-by: roland, mdoerr

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 3 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • c005682: 8303354: addCertificatesToKeystore in KeystoreImpl.m needs CFRelease call in early potential CHECK_NULL return
  • fba6dd8: 8301050: Detect Xen Virtualization on Linux aarch64
  • c6805e6: 8302791: Add specific ClassLoader object to Proxy IllegalArgumentException message

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Mar 16, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@TheRealMDoerr TheRealMDoerr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the detailed description! Backport looks correct to me.

@GoeLin
Copy link
Member Author

GoeLin commented Mar 21, 2023

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 21, 2023

Going to push as commit cc170c7.
Since your change was applied there have been 5 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 15674a9: 8304063: tools/jpackage/share/AppLauncherEnvTest.java fails when checking LD_LIBRARY_PATH
  • 752494f: 8303949: gcc10 warning Linux ppc64le - note: the layout of aggregates containing vectors with 8-byte alignment has changed in GCC 5
  • c005682: 8303354: addCertificatesToKeystore in KeystoreImpl.m needs CFRelease call in early potential CHECK_NULL return
  • fba6dd8: 8301050: Detect Xen Virtualization on Linux aarch64
  • c6805e6: 8302791: Add specific ClassLoader object to Proxy IllegalArgumentException message

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Mar 21, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Mar 21, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Mar 21, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 21, 2023

@GoeLin Pushed as commit cc170c7.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@GoeLin GoeLin deleted the goetz_backport_8292301 branch March 21, 2023 16:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants