-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 218
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8248001: javadoc generates invalid HTML pages whose ftp:// links are broken #1236
Conversation
👋 Welcome back ktakakuri! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit. |
Webrevs
|
Could someone please review this backport? |
Hi, generally it looks ok. Please revert the copyright modifications. In backports, we don't increment to the current year but only take over the copyright modifications from the upstream patch, if there were any. Also, can you please run GHA tests. Thanks! |
@ktakakuri This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 4 new commits pushed to the
Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. ➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type |
Thank you for your review. |
Looks good now (and marked as clean). The errors in windows-x64 pre-submit tests are known issues. When you merge your PR branch with current master, the issues should be gone. Next step would be to add the jdk17u-fix-request comment and label to the JBS issue. Can you do that or shall I do it on your behalf? If the latter is the case, please provide me with some text (e.g. why you want to have it in 17u, what testing you did, what's the risk...) |
Thank you, I added the label. |
Great, could you merge the PR branch with current master to eliminate the GHA failures? Did you run the langtools tests (including the one that is added here)? I will run the PR through our nightlies. In case everything is good, I'll approve the backport. |
Testing looks good. I have approved the backport - this one is ready to integrate. |
/integrate |
@ktakakuri |
/sponsor |
Going to push as commit bcb1f86.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
@RealCLanger @ktakakuri Pushed as commit bcb1f86. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
I would like to backport
8248001: javadoc generates invalid HTML pages whose ftp:// links are broken.
This is a clean backport.
Progress
Issue
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev.git pull/1236/head:pull/1236
$ git checkout pull/1236
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/1236
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev.git pull/1236/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 1236
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 1236
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/1236.diff
Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment