Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8273381: Assert in PtrQueueBufferAllocatorTest.stress_free_list_allocator_vm #128

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

GoeLin
Copy link
Member

@GoeLin GoeLin commented Jan 28, 2022

I backport this for parity with 17.0.3-oracle.


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8273381: Assert in PtrQueueBufferAllocatorTest.stress_free_list_allocator_vm

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk17u-dev pull/128/head:pull/128
$ git checkout pull/128

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/128
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk17u-dev pull/128/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 128

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 128

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk17u-dev/pull/128.diff

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

@bridgekeeper bridgekeeper bot commented Jan 28, 2022

👋 Welcome back goetz! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title Backport c80a612709f1e483575e2843c1f0ea84e1b9a257 8273381: Assert in PtrQueueBufferAllocatorTest.stress_free_list_allocator_vm Jan 28, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

@openjdk openjdk bot commented Jan 28, 2022

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

@openjdk
Copy link

@openjdk openjdk bot commented Jan 28, 2022

@GoeLin This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8273381: Assert in PtrQueueBufferAllocatorTest.stress_free_list_allocator_vm

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been no new commits pushed to the master branch. If another commit should be pushed before you perform the /integrate command, your PR will be automatically rebased. If you prefer to avoid any potential automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added ready rfr labels Jan 28, 2022
@mlbridge
Copy link

@mlbridge mlbridge bot commented Jan 28, 2022

Webrevs

@GoeLin
Copy link
Member Author

@GoeLin GoeLin commented Feb 1, 2022

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

@openjdk openjdk bot commented Feb 1, 2022

Going to push as commit c581598.
Since your change was applied there have been 4 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • cb769c0: 8269616: serviceability/dcmd/framework/VMVersionTest.java fails with Address already in use error
  • ac8a550: 8280155: [PPC64, s390] frame size checks are not yet correct
  • 22a6279: 8279924: [PPC64, s390] implement frame::is_interpreted_frame_valid checks
  • 7a5a8ab: 8280526: x86_32 Math.sqrt performance regression with -XX:UseSSE={0,1}

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated label Feb 1, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Feb 1, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready rfr labels Feb 1, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

@openjdk openjdk bot commented Feb 1, 2022

@GoeLin Pushed as commit c581598.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport clean integrated
1 participant