8304760: Add 2 Microsoft TLS roots

[MBaesken]

Backport 8304760

---

Progress

• Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
• Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
• Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

• JDK-8304760: Add 2 Microsoft TLS roots

Reviewers

• Martin Doerr (@TheRealMDoerr - Reviewer)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev.git pull/1349/head:pull/1349
$ git checkout pull/1349

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/1349
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev.git pull/1349/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 1349

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 1349

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/1349.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

[bridgekeeper]

👋 Welcome back mbaesken! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

[openjdk]

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

[mlbridge]

Webrevs

• 00: Full (ff92497a)

[MBaesken]

The patch needs a bit of adjustments (different checksum in test/jdk/sun/security/lib/cacerts/VerifyCACerts.java , src/java.base/share/data/cacerts/microsoft* goes to different location make/data/cacerts/ in jdk17 compared to jdk-head).

[TheRealMDoerr]

LGTM. Thanks for backporting!

[openjdk]

@MBaesken This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8304760: Add 2 Microsoft TLS roots

Reviewed-by: mdoerr

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 1 new commit pushed to the master branch:

• e7bac42: 8295974: jni_FatalError and Xcheck:jni warnings should print the native stack when there are no Java frames

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

[MBaesken]

/integrate

[openjdk]

Going to push as commit f655ccd.
Since your change was applied there have been 2 commits pushed to the master branch:

• e55bea4: 8299544: Improve performance of CRC32C intrinsics (non-AVX-512) for small inputs
• e7bac42: 8295974: jni_FatalError and Xcheck:jni warnings should print the native stack when there are no Java frames

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

[openjdk]

@MBaesken Pushed as commit f655ccd.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.