-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 214
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8227060: Optimize safepoint cleanup subtask order #1377
8227060: Optimize safepoint cleanup subtask order #1377
Conversation
👋 Welcome back shade! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit. |
Webrevs
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Lgtm.
@shipilev This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 22 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
Thank you! I marked the issue for maintainer approval. |
While looking at it again, I noticed that I missed the optimization from the original change: 1dbff5e -- please re-review. Re-doing testing again, expecting no problems. |
@phohensee, if you can review again, please? Thanks! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I missed that too! Ltgm, again.
Testing is clean, reviews are good, push approval is here. /integrate |
Going to push as commit 464a32b.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
Unclean backport to improve the safepoint cleanup times. Provides the grounds for the ultimate improvement in safepoint cleanup (JDK-8306738). The backport is not clean, because there are copyright years conflicts, the rename of
AbstractGangTask
toWorkerTask
is missing,WorkGang
->WorkerThreads
rename is missing,JavaThread::cast
cleanup is missing.Additional testing:
tier1 tier2 tier3
The safepoint cleanup times are slightly better on small tests, and there seem to be no regressions.
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev.git pull/1377/head:pull/1377
$ git checkout pull/1377
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/1377
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev.git pull/1377/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 1377
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 1377
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/1377.diff
Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment