8277762: Allow configuration of HOTSPOT_BUILD_USER

[andrew-m-leonard]

Adds support for configure argument --with-build-user=, which allows openjdk builds to use a generic username to allow deterministic "reproducible" build output.

---

Progress

• Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
• Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

• JDK-8277762: Allow configuration of HOTSPOT_BUILD_USER

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk17u-dev pull/163/head:pull/163
$ git checkout pull/163

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/163
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk17u-dev pull/163/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 163

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 163

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk17u-dev/pull/163.diff

[bridgekeeper]

👋 Welcome back aleonard! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

[openjdk]

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

[openjdk]

@andrew-m-leonard This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8277762: Allow configuration of HOTSPOT_BUILD_USER

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 2 new commits pushed to the master branch:

• 0e5810d: 8274171: java/nio/file/Files/probeContentType/Basic.java failed on "Content type" mismatches
• 2011c35: 8274562: (fs) UserDefinedFileAttributeView doesn't correctly determine if supported when using OverlayFS

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change.

➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type /integrate in a new comment. (Afterwards, your sponsor types /sponsor in a new comment to perform the integration).

[mlbridge]

Webrevs

• 00: Full (8351bac0)

[andrew-m-leonard]

/label build

[openjdk]

@andrew-m-leonard
The label build is not a valid label.
These labels are valid:

[andrew-m-leonard]

/integrate

[openjdk]

@andrew-m-leonard
Your change (at version 8351bac) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

[andrew-m-leonard]

Is someone able to sponsor this please?

[phohensee]

Done.

/sponsor

[openjdk]

Going to push as commit 63fe160.
Since your change was applied there have been 4 commits pushed to the master branch:

• d54675b: 8274524: SSLSocket.close() hangs if it is called during the ssl handshake
• a59e8cb: 8278346: java/nio/file/Files/probeContentType/Basic.java fails on Linux SLES15 machine
• 0e5810d: 8274171: java/nio/file/Files/probeContentType/Basic.java failed on "Content type" mismatches
• 2011c35: 8274562: (fs) UserDefinedFileAttributeView doesn't correctly determine if supported when using OverlayFS

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

[openjdk]

@phohensee @andrew-m-leonard Pushed as commit 63fe160.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

[andrew-m-leonard]

thank you @phohensee