8314495: Update to use jtreg 7.3.1

[shipilev]

Atomically brings jtreg 7.3.1 (current at mainline) to 17u. Depending on new jtreg allows to cleanly backport tests from mainline without rewriting them for older jtreg.

Thankfully, @GoeLin backported all the actual test changes that are needed for this to work.

The uncleanliness comes mostly from the gtest "version" variable conflicts. Otherwise the whole stack applies cleanly.

Additional testing:

• GHA
• Linux AArch64 tier1 tier2 tier3 tier4

---

Progress

• Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
• Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
• Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

• JDK-8314495: Update to use jtreg 7.3.1 (Enhancement - P3)

Reviewers

• Martin Doerr (@TheRealMDoerr - Reviewer)
• Christoph Langer (@RealCLanger - Reviewer)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev.git pull/1712/head:pull/1712
$ git checkout pull/1712

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/1712
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev.git pull/1712/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 1712

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 1712

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/1712.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

[bridgekeeper]

👋 Welcome back shade! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

[openjdk]

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

[shipilev]

I don't really see the point of adding all the relevant "jtreg update" issues to this PR, but I can if anyone has a strong opinion about it. @GoeLin, @RealCLanger?

[mlbridge]

Webrevs

• 00: Full (c59456d6)

[TheRealMDoerr]

This makes sense!

[openjdk]

@shipilev This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8314495: Update to use jtreg 7.3.1

Reviewed-by: mdoerr, clanger

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 8 new commits pushed to the master branch:

• f85df30: 8314139: TEST_BUG: runtime/os/THPsInThreadStackPreventionTest.java could fail on machine with large number of cores
• 8d70429: 8313626: C2 crash due to unexpected exception control flow
• 7f3f76f: 8286430: make test TEST="gtest:" exits with error when it shouldn't
• eb639a2: 8312585: Rename DisableTHPStackMitigation flag to THPStackMitigation
• 804ce09: 8312620: WSL Linux build crashes after JDK-8310233
• e0b39c7: 8312535: MidiSystem.getSoundbank() throws unexpected SecurityException
• e6b87a7: 8312182: THPs cause huge RSS due to thread start timing issue
• fbe3773: 8312394: [linux] SIGSEGV if kernel was built without hugepage support

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

[RealCLanger]

I don't really see the point of adding all the relevant "jtreg update" issues to this PR, but I can if anyone has a strong opinion about it. @GoeLin, @RealCLanger?

No strong opinion, it's fine.

[shipilev]

Before I integrate, can I ask @TheRealMDoerr @RealCLanger or @GoeLin to run this through their nightly testing too? Don't want to break stuff if we can avoid it.

[TheRealMDoerr]

We already use the new jtreg version for our nightly tests. I've put your PR into our queue.

[shipilev]

We already use the new jtreg version for our nightly tests. I've put your PR into our queue.

Ah, that would be enough then. I wanted to check if any test does not work with new jtreg, e.g. due to missing testbug backport. If your nightly already passes with 7.3.1, then we are already good.

[TheRealMDoerr]

Test results look good. Your PR is appreciated! But, testing it does not harm. I'll keep it in the queue.

[RealCLanger]

We already use the new jtreg version for our nightly tests. I've put your PR into our queue.

Ah, that would be enough then. I wanted to check if any test does not work with new jtreg, e.g. due to missing testbug backport. If your nightly already passes with 7.3.1, then we are already good.

Yes, we had already switched our testing of JDK 17 and later to 7.3.1 when we saw your PR (Thanks @ArnoZeller). Looks all fine, this PR is good to go from our end.

[shipilev]

All right then! Here goes.

/integrate

[openjdk]

Going to push as commit 75e1441.
Since your change was applied there have been 10 commits pushed to the master branch:

• c4612c1: 8207166: jdk/jshell/JdiHangingLaunchExecutionControlTest.java - launch timeout
• 5b613e3: 8312489: Increase jdk.jar.maxSignatureFileSize default which is too low for JARs such as WhiteSource/Mend unified agent jar
• f85df30: 8314139: TEST_BUG: runtime/os/THPsInThreadStackPreventionTest.java could fail on machine with large number of cores
• 8d70429: 8313626: C2 crash due to unexpected exception control flow
• 7f3f76f: 8286430: make test TEST="gtest:" exits with error when it shouldn't
• eb639a2: 8312585: Rename DisableTHPStackMitigation flag to THPStackMitigation
• 804ce09: 8312620: WSL Linux build crashes after JDK-8310233
• e0b39c7: 8312535: MidiSystem.getSoundbank() throws unexpected SecurityException
• e6b87a7: 8312182: THPs cause huge RSS due to thread start timing issue
• fbe3773: 8312394: [linux] SIGSEGV if kernel was built without hugepage support

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

[openjdk]

@shipilev Pushed as commit 75e1441.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.