8312909: C1 should not inline through interface calls with non-subtype receiver

[GoeLin]

I backport this for parity with 17.0.10-oracle.

I had to resolve because of NULL/nullptr differences.

---

Progress

• Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
• Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
• Commit message must refer to an issue
• JDK-8312909 needs maintainer approval

Issue

• JDK-8312909: C1 should not inline through interface calls with non-subtype receiver (Bug - P3 - Approved)

Reviewers

• Paul Hohensee (@phohensee - Reviewer)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev.git pull/1736/head:pull/1736
$ git checkout pull/1736

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/1736
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev.git pull/1736/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 1736

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 1736

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/1736.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

[bridgekeeper]

👋 Welcome back goetz! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

[openjdk]

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

[mlbridge]

Webrevs

• 00: Full (7d69adb3)

[openjdk]

⚠️ @GoeLin This change is now ready for you to apply for maintainer approval. This can be done directly in each associated issue or by using the /approval command.

[openjdk]

@GoeLin This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8312909: C1 should not inline through interface calls with non-subtype receiver

Reviewed-by: phh

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 9 new commits pushed to the master branch:

• 4d8549b: 8299255: Unexpected round errors in FreetypeFontScaler
• af9d522: 8232933: Javac inferred type does not conform to equality constraint
• 4636018: 8315020: The macro definition for LoongArch64 zero build is not accurate.
• 47f8718: 8314094: java/lang/ProcessHandle/InfoTest.java fails on Windows when run as user with Administrator privileges
• 0ddf1eb: 8315751: RandomTestBsi1999 fails often with timeouts on Linux ppc64le
• cc9a8e9: 8301701: java/net/DatagramSocket/DatagramSocketMulticasting.java should be hardened
• 4ac28fc: 8285516: clearPassword should be called in a finally try block
• 444f829: 8276711: compiler/codecache/cli tests failing when SegmentedCodeCache used with -Xint
• 45b6bca: 8312625: Test serviceability/dcmd/vm/TrimLibcHeapTest.java failed: RSS use increased

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

[GoeLin]

/integrate

[openjdk]

Going to push as commit fee0229.
Since your change was applied there have been 13 commits pushed to the master branch:

• 955dcb3: 8312573: Failure during CompileOnly parsing leads to ShouldNotReachHere
• bc7699a: 8304954: SegmentedCodeCache fails when using large pages
• e12d0b5: 8311592: ECKeySizeParameterSpec causes too many exceptions on third party providers
• 35cf71f: 8301065: Handle control characters in java_lang_String::print
• 4d8549b: 8299255: Unexpected round errors in FreetypeFontScaler
• af9d522: 8232933: Javac inferred type does not conform to equality constraint
• 4636018: 8315020: The macro definition for LoongArch64 zero build is not accurate.
• 47f8718: 8314094: java/lang/ProcessHandle/InfoTest.java fails on Windows when run as user with Administrator privileges
• 0ddf1eb: 8315751: RandomTestBsi1999 fails often with timeouts on Linux ppc64le
• cc9a8e9: 8301701: java/net/DatagramSocket/DatagramSocketMulticasting.java should be hardened
• ... and 3 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/compare/4e9b6da251b620a488334061451c59c36703f7ec...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

[openjdk]

@GoeLin Pushed as commit fee0229.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.