Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8315680: java/lang/ref/ReachabilityFenceTest.java should run with -Xbatch #2012

Conversation

SoniaZaldana
Copy link
Member

@SoniaZaldana SoniaZaldana commented Dec 4, 2023

Hi all,

This pull request contains a backport of commit a290256b from the openjdk/jdk repository.

The commit being backported was authored by Gergö Barany on 7 Nov 2023 and was reviewed by Doug Simon, Tom Rodriguez and Paul Sandoz.

Thanks!


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • JDK-8315680 needs maintainer approval

Issue

  • JDK-8315680: java/lang/ref/ReachabilityFenceTest.java should run with -Xbatch (Bug - P4 - Approved)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev.git pull/2012/head:pull/2012
$ git checkout pull/2012

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/2012
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev.git pull/2012/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 2012

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 2012

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/2012.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Dec 4, 2023

👋 Welcome back szaldana! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title Backport a290256bbf85a52fbeab24dab5fbe195cf58750f 8315680: java/lang/ref/ReachabilityFenceTest.java should run with -Xbatch Dec 4, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 4, 2023

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

@SoniaZaldana SoniaZaldana marked this pull request as ready for review December 5, 2023 14:27
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 5, 2023

⚠️ @SoniaZaldana This change is now ready for you to apply for maintainer approval. This can be done directly in each associated issue or by using the /approval command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added rfr Pull request is ready for review approval labels Dec 5, 2023
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Dec 5, 2023

Webrevs

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 15, 2023

@SoniaZaldana This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8315680: java/lang/ref/ReachabilityFenceTest.java should run with -Xbatch

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 36 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • dcba538: 8283400: [macos] a11y : Screen magnifier does not reflect JRadioButton value change
  • 5fe2d51: 8297968: Crash in PrintOptoAssembly
  • 873148e: 8273454: C2: Transform (-a)(-b) into ab
  • 969f105: 8302017: Allocate BadPaddingException only if it will be thrown
  • 78839e9: 8054022: HttpURLConnection timeouts with Expect: 100-Continue and no chunking
  • 6493102: 7167356: (javac) investigate failing tests in JavacParserTest
  • 71471c1: 8294254: [macOS] javax/swing/plaf/aqua/CustomComboBoxFocusTest.java failure
  • aba80d1: 8274634: Use String.equals instead of String.compareTo in java.desktop
  • 519fd89: 8295124: Atomic::add to pointer type may return wrong value
  • 5bc2302: 8271616: oddPart in MutableBigInteger::mutableModInverse contains info on final result
  • ... and 26 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/compare/a028120220f6fd28e39fe0f6190eb1f5da6a788d...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change.

➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type /integrate in a new comment. (Afterwards, your sponsor types /sponsor in a new comment to perform the integration).

@openjdk openjdk bot added ready Pull request is ready to be integrated and removed approval labels Dec 15, 2023
@SoniaZaldana
Copy link
Member Author

/integrate

@openjdk openjdk bot added the sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored label Dec 15, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 15, 2023

@SoniaZaldana
Your change (at version ce3cd9b) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

@shipilev
Copy link
Member

/sponsor

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 19, 2023

Going to push as commit c555fe3.
Since your change was applied there have been 43 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 3809b71: 8293117: Add atomic bitset functions
  • a032136: 8295068: SSLEngine throws NPE parsing CertificateRequests
  • f033de0: 8274632: Possible pointer overflow in PretouchTask chunk claiming
  • c44bd2b: 8320001: javac crashes while adding type annotations to the return type of a constructor
  • 97d8ed2: 8309733: [macOS, Accessibility] VoiceOver: Incorrect announcements of JRadioButton
  • 48c8478: 8320798: Console read line with zero out should zero out underlying buffer
  • 5653d2d: 8320597: RSA signature verification fails on signed data that does not encode params correctly
  • dcba538: 8283400: [macos] a11y : Screen magnifier does not reflect JRadioButton value change
  • 5fe2d51: 8297968: Crash in PrintOptoAssembly
  • 873148e: 8273454: C2: Transform (-a)(-b) into ab
  • ... and 33 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/compare/a028120220f6fd28e39fe0f6190eb1f5da6a788d...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Dec 19, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Dec 19, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored labels Dec 19, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 19, 2023

@shipilev @SoniaZaldana Pushed as commit c555fe3.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport clean integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants