Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8265317: [vector] assert(payload->is_object()) failed: expected 'object' value for scalar-replaced boxed vector but got: NULL #202

Conversation

TheRealMDoerr
Copy link
Contributor

@TheRealMDoerr TheRealMDoerr commented Mar 7, 2022

Clean backport of JDK-8265317


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8265317: [vector] assert(payload->is_object()) failed: expected 'object' value for scalar-replaced boxed vector but got: NULL

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk17u-dev pull/202/head:pull/202
$ git checkout pull/202

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/202
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk17u-dev pull/202/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 202

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 202

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk17u-dev/pull/202.diff

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

@bridgekeeper bridgekeeper bot commented Mar 7, 2022

👋 Welcome back mdoerr! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title Backport 58b5fb3233a9bbbfc1f1f8818be4dfd54325f1bd 8265317: [vector] assert(payload->is_object()) failed: expected 'object' value for scalar-replaced boxed vector but got: NULL Mar 7, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

@openjdk openjdk bot commented Mar 7, 2022

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

@openjdk
Copy link

@openjdk openjdk bot commented Mar 7, 2022

@TheRealMDoerr This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8265317: [vector] assert(payload->is_object()) failed: expected 'object' value for scalar-replaced boxed vector but got: NULL

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been no new commits pushed to the master branch. If another commit should be pushed before you perform the /integrate command, your PR will be automatically rebased. If you prefer to avoid any potential automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added ready rfr labels Mar 7, 2022
@mlbridge
Copy link

@mlbridge mlbridge bot commented Mar 7, 2022

Webrevs

@TheRealMDoerr
Copy link
Contributor Author

@TheRealMDoerr TheRealMDoerr commented Mar 8, 2022

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

@openjdk openjdk bot commented Mar 8, 2022

Going to push as commit eee17fb.
Since your change was applied there have been 4 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • f820a3c: 8278966: two microbenchmarks tests fail "assert(!jvms->method()->has_exception_handlers()) failed: no exception handler expected" after JDK-8275638
  • a8775f1: 8275638: GraphKit::combine_exception_states fails with "matching stack sizes" assert
  • ff1ef50: 8273056: java.util.random does not correctly sample exponential or Gaussian distributions
  • e2103de: 8276990: Memory leak in invoker.c fillInvokeRequest() during JDI operations

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated label Mar 8, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Mar 8, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready rfr labels Mar 8, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

@openjdk openjdk bot commented Mar 8, 2022

@TheRealMDoerr Pushed as commit eee17fb.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport clean integrated
1 participant