-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 231
8273454: C2: Transform (-a)*(-b) into a*b #2035
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
👋 Welcome back goetz! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
|
This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit. |
Webrevs
|
fdb7fd8 to
286a84d
Compare
|
@GoeLin Please do not rebase or force-push to an active PR as it invalidates existing review comments. Note for future reference, the bots always squash all changes into a single commit automatically as part of the integration. See OpenJDK Developers’ Guide for more information. |
286a84d to
1a7414e
Compare
|
@GoeLin Please do not rebase or force-push to an active PR as it invalidates existing review comments. Note for future reference, the bots always squash all changes into a single commit automatically as part of the integration. See OpenJDK Developers’ Guide for more information. |
shipilev
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I never thought we would backport this. But now that we do, this hunk is missing:
openjdk/jdk@756d22c#diff-b1bd52f0743843e15452764f48ff43c15dd3192a28bfb684b34149f0e964996eR83-R84
When we backported JDK-8274130, we skipped that hunk.
|
/issue 8274060 |
|
@GoeLin |
|
Thanks for catching this! I thought I had added that part :/ |
shipilev
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, this looks right.
|
|
|
@GoeLin This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be: You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 12 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
|
/integrate |
|
Going to push as commit 873148e.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
I backport this for parity with 17.0.11-oracle.
This contains follow up fix 8274060: C2: Incorrect computation after JDK-8273454 and a part of JDK-8274130) C2: MulNode::Ideal chained transformations may act on wrong nodes which is already backported, but omitted the part to be applied to this patch.
This is also the reason why a clean backport failed.
Progress
Issues
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
gitCheckout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev.git pull/2035/head:pull/2035$ git checkout pull/2035Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/2035$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev.git pull/2035/headUsing Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 2035View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 2035Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/2035.diff
Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment