Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8205076: [17u] Inet6AddressImpl.c: lookupIfLocalHost accesses int InetAddress.preferIPv6Address as a boolean #2048

Closed

Conversation

shipilev
Copy link
Member

@shipilev shipilev commented Dec 12, 2023

This is a 11u and 17u -specific bug, see JBS and its comments for more details. I think we can fix this by explicitly checking against the PREFER_IPV6_VALUE, like post JDK 18 code does.

Additional testing:

  • macos-aarch64-server-fastdebug, DcmdMBeanTestCheckJni.java now passes
  • macos-aarch64-server-fastdebug, jdk_net

Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • JDK-8205076 needs maintainer approval

Issue

  • JDK-8205076: [17u] Inet6AddressImpl.c: lookupIfLocalHost accesses int InetAddress.preferIPv6Address as a boolean (Bug - P4 - Approved)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev.git pull/2048/head:pull/2048
$ git checkout pull/2048

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/2048
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev.git pull/2048/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 2048

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 2048

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/2048.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Dec 12, 2023

👋 Welcome back shade! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Dec 12, 2023
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Dec 12, 2023

Webrevs

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 12, 2023

⚠️ @shipilev This change is now ready for you to apply for maintainer approval. This can be done directly in each associated issue or by using the /approval command.

@shipilev
Copy link
Member Author

/approval request 17u-specific fix, does what upstream code already do post JDK 18. Testing passes on platform where tests used to fail.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 19, 2023

@shipilev
8205076: The approval request has been created successfully.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the approval label Dec 19, 2023
@GoeLin
Copy link
Member

GoeLin commented Dec 20, 2023

Good catch!

@GoeLin
Copy link
Member

GoeLin commented Dec 20, 2023

/approve yes

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 20, 2023

@GoeLin
8205076: The approval request has been approved.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 20, 2023

@shipilev This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8205076: [17u] Inet6AddressImpl.c: `lookupIfLocalHost` accesses `int InetAddress.preferIPv6Address` as a boolean

Reviewed-by: phh

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 1 new commit pushed to the master branch:

  • 43d15d1: 8307926: Support byte-sized atomic bitset operations

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added ready Pull request is ready to be integrated and removed approval labels Dec 20, 2023
@shipilev
Copy link
Member Author

shipilev commented Jan 3, 2024

Thanks!

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 3, 2024

Going to push as commit 3eb15b0.
Since your change was applied there have been 4 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 2a0d0ac: 8318183: C2: VM may crash after hitting node limit
  • 53211e0: 8318961: increase javacserver connection timeout values and max retry attempts
  • 5d86e19: 8320937: support latest VS2022 MSC_VER in abstract_vm_version.cpp
  • 43d15d1: 8307926: Support byte-sized atomic bitset operations

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Jan 3, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Jan 3, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Jan 3, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 3, 2024

@shipilev Pushed as commit 3eb15b0.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants