-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 223
8306408: Fix the format of several tables in building.md #2205
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
👋 Welcome back zzambers! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit. |
Webrevs
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
building.md
changes look fine.
How was the HTML re-generated? I'm seeing some unrelated changes which I guess may be down to the tool version used?
+@@ -11,14 +11,14 @@
+ span.underline{text-decoration: underline;}
+ div.column{display: inline-block; vertical-align: top; width: 50%;}
+ </style>
+- <link rel="stylesheet" href="../make/data/docs-resources/resources/jdk-default.css" />
++ <link rel="stylesheet" href="../make/data/docs-resources/resources/jdk-default.css">
+ <!--[if lt IE 9]>
+ <script src="//cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/html5shiv/3.7.3/html5shiv-printshiv.min.js"></script>
+ <![endif]-->
+ <style type="text/css">pre, code, tt { color: #1d6ae5; }</style>
+ </head>
+ <body>
+-<header id="title-block-header">
++<header>
+ <h1 class="title">Building the JDK</h1>
+ </header>
+ <nav id="TOC">
@gnu-andrew I have used appropriate makefile target on rhel-8 (pandoc 2.0.6) |
I can try with different version of pandoc. |
@gnu-andrew I have tried on few more systems, but pandoc from rhel-8 is closest to orignal generator I could get.
Unfortunately generated html does not include information about pandoc used. Rhel-8's pandoc (2.0.6-6.el8_6) seems pretty close. |
Thanks for looking into this, @zzambers. Yes, this is the nightmare any time we have checked-in generated files. I'm mulling over backporting the change to remove the generated configure in the next cycle, as that keeps being altered with unrelated changes when people using a different autoconf. I'm happy for this to go in as is. It would be nice to have known what was used to generate the original, but I imagine it was close to what you have on RHEL 8. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good to go.
|
/approval request Fixes format of tables in doc/building.md, so they display correctly on GitHub. (docs only change) |
Based on my experiments and release info, pandoc used was it has: but does not have: |
I thought maybe debian buster (oldoldstable), but no. This one has Output of pandoc on RHEL-8 seems closest (of all current pandoc packages on any version of RHEL, Debian, Ubuntu and supported Fedora). |
Yes it may not even be a packaged version but a local install. Thanks for investigating so thoroughly. |
/approve yes |
@gnu-andrew |
@zzambers This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 11 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@gnu-andrew) but any other Committer may sponsor as well. ➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type |
@gnu-andrew thanks |
Oh, when moving on to jdk11u-dev, I have found there is a script for creating pandoc bundle in devkit. This seems to be the right pandoc. I'll try to update html as changeset is not yet in (as I am not commiter here). Hopefully bot will not be too angry about that.. :) |
/integrate |
/sponsor |
Going to push as commit ef598eb.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
@gnu-andrew @zzambers Pushed as commit ef598eb. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
Oops, sorry I sponsored it before I saw this. I don't think it's too much of an issue. At least we now know the 'correct' way (though it's hardly obvious!) |
Backport fixing several tables in
doc/building.md
, so they would display correctly in GitHub. Change set applied almost cleanly todoc/building.md
(only last table has one more target in original changeset). Filedoc/building.html
was regenerated.Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev.git pull/2205/head:pull/2205
$ git checkout pull/2205
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/2205
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev.git pull/2205/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 2205
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 2205
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/2205.diff
Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment