-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 208
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8324648: Avoid NoSuchMethodError when instantiating NativePRNG #2308
8324648: Avoid NoSuchMethodError when instantiating NativePRNG #2308
Conversation
👋 Welcome back ogillespie! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
@olivergillespie This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 8 new commits pushed to the
Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. ➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type |
This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit. |
|
Webrevs
|
/approval request Performance improvement in SecureRandom., which I have seen on the hot path in real applications. Clean backport, low risk in my opinion (simple change to only one file). It has been in tip for over 4 weeks. Confirmed the benchmark results match tip (saves ~2100ns in SecureRandom constructor). Note: GHA riscv64 cross-compile failing, unrelated to this change, seen in all other recent PRs. |
@olivergillespie |
@olivergillespie This pull request has been inactive for more than 4 weeks and will be automatically closed if another 4 weeks passes without any activity. To avoid this, simply add a new comment to the pull request. Feel free to ask for assistance if you need help with progressing this pull request towards integration! |
Waiting for next release for approval as requested. |
@olivergillespie This pull request has been inactive for more than 4 weeks and will be automatically closed if another 4 weeks passes without any activity. To avoid this, simply add a new comment to the pull request. Feel free to ask for assistance if you need help with progressing this pull request towards integration! |
/integrate |
@olivergillespie |
/sponsor |
Going to push as commit b275236.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
@shipilev @olivergillespie Pushed as commit b275236. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
Hi all,
This pull request contains a backport of commit 69b2674c from the openjdk/jdk repository.
The commit being backported was authored by Oli Gillespie on 9 Feb 2024 and was reviewed by Aleksey Shipilev, Weijun Wang, Chen Liang and Valerie Peng.
I had to manually resolve the copyright change, but apart from that it's clean.
Benchmark results (
make test TEST=micro:org.openjdk.bench.java.security.SecureRandomBench
, using the benchmark from openjdk/jdk#17559):Thanks!
Progress
Issue
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev.git pull/2308/head:pull/2308
$ git checkout pull/2308
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/2308
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev.git pull/2308/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 2308
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 2308
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/2308.diff
Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment