-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 208
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8275868: ciReplay: Inlining fails with "unloaded signature classes" due to wrong protection domains #2334
Conversation
👋 Welcome back goetz! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
@GoeLin This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 4 new commits pushed to the
Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit. |
Webrevs
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks basically good. Please see my suggestions.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok. Thanks for the update.
|
/integrate |
Going to push as commit ba77d0b.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
I had to do some trivial resolves.
I add some refactorings from "8262912: ciReplay: replay does not simulate unresolved classes"
to the edited test files to make the test compile. I also had to fix the path to WhiteBox.
I also added two methods to query names to ciEnv from
"8271911: replay compilations of methods which use JSR292 (easy cases)".
this calls further into dyno_name(). I disabled this, it is not needed as long as 8262912 is not backported.
Test reproduces the issue as expected.
For follow up 8276227 see dependent pull request.
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev.git pull/2334/head:pull/2334
$ git checkout pull/2334
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/2334
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev.git pull/2334/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 2334
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 2334
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/2334.diff
Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment