Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8297292: java/nio/channels/FileChannel/FileExtensionAndMap.java is too slow #2349

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

GoeLin
Copy link
Member

@GoeLin GoeLin commented Mar 28, 2024

I backport this for parity with 17.0.12-oracle.

Skipped ProblemList patch, file was not problemlisted.
Deleted the file by hand, patch did not apply

As this only deletes a test, I will mark it clean.


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • JDK-8297292 needs maintainer approval
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8297292: java/nio/channels/FileChannel/FileExtensionAndMap.java is too slow (Bug - P3 - Approved)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev.git pull/2349/head:pull/2349
$ git checkout pull/2349

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/2349
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev.git pull/2349/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 2349

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 2349

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/2349.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Mar 28, 2024

👋 Welcome back goetz! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 28, 2024

@GoeLin This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8297292: java/nio/channels/FileChannel/FileExtensionAndMap.java is too slow

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 3 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 4ced080: 8276227: ciReplay: SIGSEGV if classfile for replay compilation is not present after JDK-8275868
  • d2df108: 8286045: Use ForceGC for cleaner test cases
  • ba77d0b: 8275868: ciReplay: Inlining fails with "unloaded signature classes" due to wrong protection domains

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title Backport 84e47996e88cf640e5e9d5ab4be8a640c67afbf5 8297292: java/nio/channels/FileChannel/FileExtensionAndMap.java is too slow Mar 28, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 28, 2024

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

@openjdk openjdk bot added backport rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Mar 28, 2024
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Mar 28, 2024

Webrevs

@GoeLin
Copy link
Member Author

GoeLin commented Mar 28, 2024

/clean

@openjdk openjdk bot added the clean label Mar 28, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 28, 2024

@GoeLin This backport pull request is now marked as clean

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 28, 2024

⚠️ @GoeLin This change is now ready for you to apply for maintainer approval. This can be done directly in each associated issue or by using the /approval command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added approval ready Pull request is ready to be integrated and removed approval labels Mar 30, 2024
@GoeLin
Copy link
Member Author

GoeLin commented Apr 1, 2024

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 1, 2024

Going to push as commit 615c01b.
Since your change was applied there have been 11 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 8e132c4: 8163229: several regression tests have a main method that is never executed
  • 7680369: 8296610: java/net/HttpURLConnection/SetAuthenticator/HTTPSetAuthenticatorTest.java failed with "BindException: Address already in use: connect"
  • e59eeb0: 8297645: Drop the test/jdk/java/net/httpclient/reactivestreams-tck-tests/TckDriver.java test
  • b4e64ff: 8296137: diags-examples.xml is broken
  • b37df14: 8163921: HttpURLConnection default Accept header is malformed according to HTTP/1.1 RFC
  • 1e777ec: 8328165: improve assert(idx < _maxlrg) failed: oob
  • 45de685: 8320005: Allow loading of shared objects with .a extension on AIX
  • e82d936: 8328812: Update and move siphash license
  • 4ced080: 8276227: ciReplay: SIGSEGV if classfile for replay compilation is not present after JDK-8275868
  • d2df108: 8286045: Use ForceGC for cleaner test cases
  • ... and 1 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/compare/a6180f720c61d9ca137eed11b8aec40f5233df8d...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Apr 1, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Apr 1, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Apr 1, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 1, 2024

@GoeLin Pushed as commit 615c01b.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@GoeLin GoeLin deleted the goetz_backport_8297292 branch April 1, 2024 18:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport clean integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant