Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8329223: Parallel: Parallel GC resizes heap even if -Xms = -Xmx #2480

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

benty-amzn
Copy link

@benty-amzn benty-amzn commented May 17, 2024

Clean backport of a low-risk change to address unexpected behavior with Parallel GC when Xms == Xmx
Passes local tier-1 testing on linux x86_64


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • JDK-8329223 needs maintainer approval

Issue

  • JDK-8329223: Parallel: Parallel GC resizes heap even if -Xms = -Xmx (Bug - P3 - Approved)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev.git pull/2480/head:pull/2480
$ git checkout pull/2480

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/2480
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev.git pull/2480/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 2480

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 2480

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/2480.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented May 17, 2024

👋 Welcome back btaylor! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 17, 2024

@benty-amzn This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8329223: Parallel: Parallel GC resizes heap even if -Xms = -Xmx

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 6 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 060c250: 8177107: Reduce memory footprint of java.lang.reflect.Constructor/Method
  • 4071b8c: 8286781: Replace the deprecated/obsolete gethostbyname and inet_addr calls
  • a640001: 8312194: test/hotspot/jtreg/applications/ctw/modules/jdk_crypto_ec.java cannot handle empty modules
  • a632247: 8319338: tools/jpackage/share/RuntimeImageTest.java fails with -XX:+UseZGC
  • e00211b: 8321107: Add more test cases for JDK-8319372
  • 6264c70: 8273153: Consolidate file_exists into os:file_exists

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title Backport aca1e8365bf0f64bf18caf798bbca1d25b3c4117 8329223: Parallel: Parallel GC resizes heap even if -Xms = -Xmx May 17, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 17, 2024

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 17, 2024

⚠️ @benty-amzn This change is now ready for you to apply for maintainer approval. This can be done directly in each associated issue or by using the /approval command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label May 17, 2024
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented May 17, 2024

Webrevs

@benty-amzn
Copy link
Author

/approval request Clean backport of a low-risk change to address unexpected behavior with Parallel GC when Xms == Xmx.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 17, 2024

@benty-amzn
8329223: The approval request has been created successfully.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the approval label May 17, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot added ready Pull request is ready to be integrated and removed approval labels May 27, 2024
@benty-amzn
Copy link
Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 28, 2024

Going to push as commit f4da0e7.
Since your change was applied there have been 9 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • d1e31f6: 8289643: File descriptor leak with ProcessBuilder.startPipeline
  • 69e6736: 8314835: gtest wrappers should be marked as flagless
  • 6c3a188: 8320681: [macos] Test tools/jpackage/macosx/MacAppStoreJlinkOptionsTest.java timed out on macOS
  • 060c250: 8177107: Reduce memory footprint of java.lang.reflect.Constructor/Method
  • 4071b8c: 8286781: Replace the deprecated/obsolete gethostbyname and inet_addr calls
  • a640001: 8312194: test/hotspot/jtreg/applications/ctw/modules/jdk_crypto_ec.java cannot handle empty modules
  • a632247: 8319338: tools/jpackage/share/RuntimeImageTest.java fails with -XX:+UseZGC
  • e00211b: 8321107: Add more test cases for JDK-8319372
  • 6264c70: 8273153: Consolidate file_exists into os:file_exists

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label May 28, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this May 28, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels May 28, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 28, 2024

@benty-amzn Pushed as commit f4da0e7.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport clean integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant