Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8265919: RunThese30M fails "assert((!(((((JfrTraceIdBits::load(value)) & ((1 << 4) << 8)) != 0))))) failed: invariant" #2504

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

rkmauryaa
Copy link
Contributor

@rkmauryaa rkmauryaa commented May 28, 2024

clean backport to remove assertion which asserts artifact is not serialized and assumes only JfrRecorderThread can perform serialization of artifacts marked during the window between rotate() and end_recording(), which is not true because a GC thread during class unloading process will serialize the class loaders associated with the unloaded classes. We should remove this assertion and let the code fall through and explicitly clear the serialize and transient meta bits.


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • JDK-8265919 needs maintainer approval

Issue

  • JDK-8265919: RunThese30M fails "assert((!(((((JfrTraceIdBits::load(value)) & ((1 << 4) << 8)) != 0))))) failed: invariant" (Bug - P3 - Approved)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev.git pull/2504/head:pull/2504
$ git checkout pull/2504

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/2504
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev.git pull/2504/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 2504

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 2504

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/2504.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented May 28, 2024

👋 Welcome back rkmauryaa! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 28, 2024

@rkmauryaa This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8265919: RunThese30M fails "assert((!(((((JfrTraceIdBits::load(value)) & ((1 << 4) << 8)) != 0))))) failed: invariant"

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 6 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 1ead7a7: 8331265: Bump update version for OpenJDK: jdk-17.0.13
  • c9d83d3: 8325203: System.exit(0) kills the launched 3rd party application
  • 0cfee92: 8294699: Launcher causes lingering busy cursor
  • f4da0e7: 8329223: Parallel: Parallel GC resizes heap even if -Xms = -Xmx
  • d1e31f6: 8289643: File descriptor leak with ProcessBuilder.startPipeline
  • 69e6736: 8314835: gtest wrappers should be marked as flagless

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change.

➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type /integrate in a new comment. (Afterwards, your sponsor types /sponsor in a new comment to perform the integration).

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title Backport ffa34ed429079827c9b0acb843288fde4b7fa53d 8265919: RunThese30M fails "assert((!(((((JfrTraceIdBits::load(value)) & ((1 << 4) << 8)) != 0))))) failed: invariant" May 28, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 28, 2024

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

@rkmauryaa rkmauryaa marked this pull request as ready for review May 28, 2024 15:20
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 28, 2024

⚠️ @rkmauryaa This change is now ready for you to apply for maintainer approval. This can be done directly in each associated issue or by using the /approval command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label May 28, 2024
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented May 28, 2024

Webrevs

@rkmauryaa
Copy link
Contributor Author

/approval request This backport removes assertion which asserts artifact is not serialized and explicitly clear the serialize and transient meta bits, we do this because a GC thread during class unloading process can serialize the class loaders associated with the unloaded classes which causes assertion to fail.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 28, 2024

@rkmauryaa
8265919: The approval request has been created successfully.

@openjdk openjdk bot added approval ready Pull request is ready to be integrated and removed approval labels May 28, 2024
@rkmauryaa
Copy link
Contributor Author

/integrate

@openjdk openjdk bot added the sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored label May 29, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 29, 2024

@rkmauryaa
Your change (at version 381db0d) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

@TheRealMDoerr
Copy link
Contributor

/sponsor

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 29, 2024

Going to push as commit 787cf27.
Since your change was applied there have been 8 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 24aa1e1: 8313873: java/nio/channels/DatagramChannel/SendReceiveMaxSize.java fails on AIX due to small default RCVBUF size and different IPv6 Header interpretation
  • cc3f0e5: 8308144: Uncontrolled memory consumption in SSLFlowDelegate.Reader
  • 1ead7a7: 8331265: Bump update version for OpenJDK: jdk-17.0.13
  • c9d83d3: 8325203: System.exit(0) kills the launched 3rd party application
  • 0cfee92: 8294699: Launcher causes lingering busy cursor
  • f4da0e7: 8329223: Parallel: Parallel GC resizes heap even if -Xms = -Xmx
  • d1e31f6: 8289643: File descriptor leak with ProcessBuilder.startPipeline
  • 69e6736: 8314835: gtest wrappers should be marked as flagless

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label May 29, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this May 29, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored labels May 29, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 29, 2024

@TheRealMDoerr @rkmauryaa Pushed as commit 787cf27.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport clean integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants