Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8324668: JDWP process management needs more efficient file descriptor handling #2557

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

dimitryc
Copy link

@dimitryc dimitryc commented Jun 10, 2024

The original patch applies almost cleanly except for copyright years

Additional testing: passed local test1-4 testing on macos-aarch64

It's needed as a prerequisite to fix JDK-8324577 (already backported to JDK 21)


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • JDK-8324668 needs maintainer approval

Issue

  • JDK-8324668: JDWP process management needs more efficient file descriptor handling (Enhancement - P3 - Approved)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev.git pull/2557/head:pull/2557
$ git checkout pull/2557

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/2557
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev.git pull/2557/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 2557

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 2557

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/2557.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jun 10, 2024

👋 Welcome back dcherepanov! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 10, 2024

@dimitryc This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8324668: JDWP process management needs more efficient file descriptor handling

Reviewed-by: mdoerr

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 28 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 938efc0: 8315437: Enable parallelism in vmTestbase/nsk/monitoring/stress/classload tests
  • 433fc2f: 8315442: Enable parallelism in vmTestbase/nsk/monitoring/stress/thread tests
  • d953de6: 8313394: Array Elements in OldObjectSample event has the incorrect description
  • bc5639a: 8325179: Race in BasicDirectoryModel.validateFileCache
  • d3c1ad3: 8261433: Better pkcs11 performance for libpkcs11:C_EncryptInit/libpkcs11:C_DecryptInit
  • 7bc22f7: 8279164: Disable TLS_ECDH_* cipher suites
  • d99641e: 7124313: [macosx] Swing Popups should overlap taskbar
  • 92daaf2: 8331885: C2: meet between unloaded and speculative types is not symmetric
  • 8414ee3: 8294148: Support JSplitPane for instructions and test UI
  • 6910365: 8316104: Open source several Swing SplitPane and RadioButton related tests
  • ... and 18 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/compare/7d0d793ea51e7996ec716034841c88ec4d1cd6b3...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Jun 10, 2024
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Jun 10, 2024

Webrevs

Copy link
Contributor

@TheRealMDoerr TheRealMDoerr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 11, 2024

⚠️ @dimitryc This change is now ready for you to apply for maintainer approval. This can be done directly in each associated issue or by using the /approval command.

@dimitryc
Copy link
Author

Thanks for the review!

@dimitryc
Copy link
Author

/approval request This is a prerequisite change for JDK-8324577 (already backported to JDK 21). Applies cleanly except for copyright years. Passes local tier1-4 testing on macos-aarch64.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 12, 2024

@dimitryc
8324668: The approval request has been created successfully.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the approval label Jun 12, 2024
@RealCLanger
Copy link
Contributor

@dimitryc Looks like this PR is not recognized as backport - I guess you have to fix this as described above. (Set the PR title to Backport with the hash of the original commit)

@openjdk openjdk bot added ready Pull request is ready to be integrated and removed approval labels Jun 12, 2024
@dimitryc dimitryc changed the title 8324668: JDWP process management needs more efficient file descriptor handling Backport a6632487863db5ff3136cdcc76b7440c15ce6be9 Jun 12, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title Backport a6632487863db5ff3136cdcc76b7440c15ce6be9 8324668: JDWP process management needs more efficient file descriptor handling Jun 12, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 12, 2024

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

@dimitryc
Copy link
Author

@dimitryc Looks like this PR is not recognized as backport - I guess you have to fix this as described above. (Set the PR title to Backport with the hash of the original commit)

Thanks! Updated the PR title. Looks like it's recognized as backport now.

@dimitryc
Copy link
Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 12, 2024

Going to push as commit f9c11cb.
Since your change was applied there have been 30 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 0a4f926: 8308184: Launching java with large number of jars in classpath with java.protocol.handler.pkgs system property set can lead to StackOverflowError
  • 08c3774: 8333477: Delete extra empty spaces in Makefiles
  • 938efc0: 8315437: Enable parallelism in vmTestbase/nsk/monitoring/stress/classload tests
  • 433fc2f: 8315442: Enable parallelism in vmTestbase/nsk/monitoring/stress/thread tests
  • d953de6: 8313394: Array Elements in OldObjectSample event has the incorrect description
  • bc5639a: 8325179: Race in BasicDirectoryModel.validateFileCache
  • d3c1ad3: 8261433: Better pkcs11 performance for libpkcs11:C_EncryptInit/libpkcs11:C_DecryptInit
  • 7bc22f7: 8279164: Disable TLS_ECDH_* cipher suites
  • d99641e: 7124313: [macosx] Swing Popups should overlap taskbar
  • 92daaf2: 8331885: C2: meet between unloaded and speculative types is not symmetric
  • ... and 20 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/compare/7d0d793ea51e7996ec716034841c88ec4d1cd6b3...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Jun 12, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Jun 12, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Jun 12, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 12, 2024

@dimitryc Pushed as commit f9c11cb.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@dimitryc dimitryc deleted the backport-8324668 branch June 12, 2024 11:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport clean integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants