Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8329109: Threads::print_on() tries to print CPU time for terminated GC threads #2698

Closed

Conversation

MBaesken
Copy link
Member

@MBaesken MBaesken commented Jul 9, 2024

Backport of 8329109


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • JDK-8329109 needs maintainer approval

Issue

  • JDK-8329109: Threads::print_on() tries to print CPU time for terminated GC threads (Bug - P3 - Approved)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev.git pull/2698/head:pull/2698
$ git checkout pull/2698

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/2698
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev.git pull/2698/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 2698

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 2698

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/2698.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jul 9, 2024

👋 Welcome back mbaesken! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 9, 2024

@MBaesken This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8329109: Threads::print_on() tries to print CPU time for terminated GC threads

Reviewed-by: rrich

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 4 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • e809008: 8300910: Remove metaprogramming/integralConstant.hpp
  • 952d272: 8300265: Remove metaprogramming/isSigned.hpp
  • f9acc53: 8300260: Remove metaprogramming/isSame.hpp
  • 3069e3e: 8305959: x86: Improve itable_stub

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title Backport c1cfb43d8de8d0eed01b9bb6aa1202dc7cbff007 8329109: Threads::print_on() tries to print CPU time for terminated GC threads Jul 9, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 9, 2024

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

@openjdk openjdk bot added backport rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Jul 9, 2024
@MBaesken
Copy link
Member Author

MBaesken commented Jul 9, 2024

jdk17 has a little diff in the Threads::print_on method - StringDedup::threads_do(&cl); is present there, those threads are JavaThreads in 21+ but not in lower releases (see 8305566: Change StringDedup thread to derive from JavaThread).

@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Jul 9, 2024

Webrevs

@reinrich
Copy link
Member

reinrich commented Jul 9, 2024

Looks good.
Thanks, Richard.

@MBaesken
Copy link
Member Author

MBaesken commented Jul 9, 2024

macos has currently GHA issues, those are unrelated and worked on in separate PRs.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 9, 2024

⚠️ @MBaesken This change is now ready for you to apply for maintainer approval. This can be done directly in each associated issue or by using the /approval command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added approval ready Pull request is ready to be integrated and removed approval labels Jul 9, 2024
@MBaesken
Copy link
Member Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 10, 2024

Going to push as commit 3d83f3e.
Since your change was applied there have been 5 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 1e63af9: 8300806: Update googletest to v1.13.0
  • e809008: 8300910: Remove metaprogramming/integralConstant.hpp
  • 952d272: 8300265: Remove metaprogramming/isSigned.hpp
  • f9acc53: 8300260: Remove metaprogramming/isSame.hpp
  • 3069e3e: 8305959: x86: Improve itable_stub

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Jul 10, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Jul 10, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Jul 10, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 10, 2024

@MBaesken Pushed as commit 3d83f3e.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants