8303920: Avoid calling out to python in DataDescriptorSignatureMissing test

[cost0much]

Backport of improvements to DataDescriptorSignatureMissing test; already backported to 21. Unclean for this trivial issue fix in 22 that adds a bug-id for @ignore. Otherwise, it's a clean backport. Affected test passes.

---

Progress

• Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
• Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
• JDK-8303920 needs maintainer approval
• Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

• JDK-8303920: Avoid calling out to python in DataDescriptorSignatureMissing test (Enhancement - P4 - Approved)

Reviewers

• Paul Hohensee (@phohensee - Reviewer)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev.git pull/2812/head:pull/2812
$ git checkout pull/2812

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/2812
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev.git pull/2812/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 2812

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 2812

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/2812.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

[bridgekeeper]

👋 Welcome back cost0much! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

[openjdk]

@cost0much This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8303920: Avoid calling out to python in DataDescriptorSignatureMissing test

Reviewed-by: phh

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 9 new commits pushed to the master branch:

• be4f913: 8312049: runtime/logging/ClassLoadUnloadTest can be improved
• 8dbd677: 8315576: compiler/codecache/CodeCacheFullCountTest.java fails after JDK-8314837
• c103409: 8308891: TestCDSVMCrash.java needs @requires vm.cds
• d12077d: 8284316: Support accessibility ManualTestFrame.java for non SwingSet tests
• 6cbedd9: 8273216: JCMD does not work across container boundaries with Podman
• d5d26be: 8315936: Parallelize gc/stress/TestStressG1Humongous.java test
• 2e3ca31: 8303891: Speed up Zip64SizeTest using a small ZIP64 file
• 27c92b6: 8299813: java/nio/channels/DatagramChannel/Disconnect.java fails with jtreg test timeout due to lost datagram
• 61e0a11: 8315684: Parallelize sun/security/util/math/TestIntegerModuloP.java

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@phohensee) but any other Committer may sponsor as well.

➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type /integrate in a new comment. (Afterwards, your sponsor types /sponsor in a new comment to perform the integration).

[openjdk]

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

[mlbridge]

Webrevs

• 00: Full (1913854e)

[phohensee]

Looks like a clean backport from 21u.

[openjdk]

⚠️ @cost0much This change is now ready for you to apply for maintainer approval. This can be done directly in each associated issue or by using the /approval command.

[cost0much]

/approval request Improves the test DataDescriptorSignatureMissing added in JDK22. Does not apply cleanly, but the discrepancy is trivial. Affected test passes. Risk is low: the change is test code only.

[openjdk]

@cost0much
8303920: The approval request has been created successfully.

[GoeLin]

Hi @cost0much,
It seems you fixed the same issue as in the 21u backport.
If you base your backport to 17u on the 21u commit, it is more likely to be clean.
This saves work for the reviewer.
... just for the next time...

[cost0much]

/integrate

[openjdk]

@cost0much
Your change (at version 1913854) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

[Rudometov]

/sponsor

[openjdk]

Going to push as commit 64ab2fa.
Since your change was applied there have been 10 commits pushed to the master branch:

• 97e4a93: 8316193: jdk/jfr/event/oldobject/TestListenerLeak.java java.lang.Exception: Could not find leak
• be4f913: 8312049: runtime/logging/ClassLoadUnloadTest can be improved
• 8dbd677: 8315576: compiler/codecache/CodeCacheFullCountTest.java fails after JDK-8314837
• c103409: 8308891: TestCDSVMCrash.java needs @requires vm.cds
• d12077d: 8284316: Support accessibility ManualTestFrame.java for non SwingSet tests
• 6cbedd9: 8273216: JCMD does not work across container boundaries with Podman
• d5d26be: 8315936: Parallelize gc/stress/TestStressG1Humongous.java test
• 2e3ca31: 8303891: Speed up Zip64SizeTest using a small ZIP64 file
• 27c92b6: 8299813: java/nio/channels/DatagramChannel/Disconnect.java fails with jtreg test timeout due to lost datagram
• 61e0a11: 8315684: Parallelize sun/security/util/math/TestIntegerModuloP.java

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

[openjdk]

@Rudometov @cost0much Pushed as commit 64ab2fa.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.