Skip to content

8335493: check_gc_overhead_limit should reset SoftRefPolicy::_should_clear_all_soft_refs #2838

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed

Conversation

mmyxym
Copy link

@mmyxym mmyxym commented Aug 30, 2024

Clean backport of fix of soft-ref cleaning in Parallel Full GC.


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • JDK-8335493 needs maintainer approval

Issue

  • JDK-8335493: check_gc_overhead_limit should reset SoftRefPolicy::_should_clear_all_soft_refs (Bug - P4 - Approved)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev.git pull/2838/head:pull/2838
$ git checkout pull/2838

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/2838
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev.git pull/2838/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 2838

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 2838

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/2838.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Aug 30, 2024

👋 Welcome back lmao! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Aug 30, 2024

@mmyxym This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8335493: check_gc_overhead_limit should reset SoftRefPolicy::_should_clear_all_soft_refs

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 6 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 90b0fb0: 8332589: ubsan: unix/native/libjava/ProcessImpl_md.c:562:5: runtime error: null pointer passed as argument 2, which is declared to never be null
  • 9150f50: 8337780: RISC-V: C2: Change C calling convention for sp to NS
  • b2c92fd: 8319817: Charset constructor should make defensive copy of aliases
  • 42b5e12: 8287003: InputStreamReader::read() can return zero despite writing a char in the buffer
  • 3ddae29: 8331789: ubsan: deoptimization.cpp:403:29: runtime error: load of value 208, which is not a valid value for type 'bool'
  • acfce69: 8332904: ubsan ppc64le: c1_LIRGenerator_ppc.cpp:581:21: runtime error: signed integer overflow: 9223372036854775807 + 1 cannot be represented in type 'long int'

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change.

➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type /integrate in a new comment. (Afterwards, your sponsor types /sponsor in a new comment to perform the integration).

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title Backport cff9e246cc2fbd3914f40bb71daa85dcf7731396 8335493: check_gc_overhead_limit should reset SoftRefPolicy::_should_clear_all_soft_refs Aug 30, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Aug 30, 2024

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Aug 30, 2024

⚠️ @mmyxym This change is now ready for you to apply for maintainer approval. This can be done directly in each associated issue or by using the /approval command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Aug 30, 2024
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Aug 30, 2024

Webrevs

@mmyxym
Copy link
Author

mmyxym commented Aug 30, 2024

/approval request It's for fixing soft-ref resetting in Parallel Full GC. The risk is very low.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Aug 30, 2024

@mmyxym
8335493: The approval request has been created successfully.

@openjdk openjdk bot added approval ready Pull request is ready to be integrated and removed approval labels Aug 30, 2024
@mmyxym
Copy link
Author

mmyxym commented Sep 3, 2024

/integrate

@openjdk openjdk bot added the sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored label Sep 3, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 3, 2024

@mmyxym
Your change (at version 1c68ee4) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

@phohensee
Copy link
Member

/sponsor

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 3, 2024

Going to push as commit d2cae5d.
Since your change was applied there have been 7 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • dc69e05: 8325587: Shenandoah: ShenandoahLock should allow blocking in VM
  • 90b0fb0: 8332589: ubsan: unix/native/libjava/ProcessImpl_md.c:562:5: runtime error: null pointer passed as argument 2, which is declared to never be null
  • 9150f50: 8337780: RISC-V: C2: Change C calling convention for sp to NS
  • b2c92fd: 8319817: Charset constructor should make defensive copy of aliases
  • 42b5e12: 8287003: InputStreamReader::read() can return zero despite writing a char in the buffer
  • 3ddae29: 8331789: ubsan: deoptimization.cpp:403:29: runtime error: load of value 208, which is not a valid value for type 'bool'
  • acfce69: 8332904: ubsan ppc64le: c1_LIRGenerator_ppc.cpp:581:21: runtime error: signed integer overflow: 9223372036854775807 + 1 cannot be represented in type 'long int'

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Sep 3, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Sep 3, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored labels Sep 3, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 3, 2024

@phohensee @mmyxym Pushed as commit d2cae5d.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport clean integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants