Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8325851: Hide PassFailJFrame.Builder constructor #3014

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

GoeLin
Copy link
Member

@GoeLin GoeLin commented Oct 29, 2024

I backport this for parity with 17.0.14-oracle.

I omit the changes to AcceleratorTest as 8315701: [macos] Regression: KeyEvent has different keycode on different keyboard layouts
is not in 17.
The test does not use PassFailJFrame yet.

Testing: All tests for linux and mac start up.
Double checked two windows tests.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • JDK-8325851 needs maintainer approval

Issue

  • JDK-8325851: Hide PassFailJFrame.Builder constructor (Bug - P5 - Approved)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev.git pull/3014/head:pull/3014
$ git checkout pull/3014

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/3014
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev.git pull/3014/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 3014

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 3014

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/3014.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Oct 29, 2024

👋 Welcome back goetz! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into pr/3012 will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 29, 2024

@GoeLin This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8325851: Hide PassFailJFrame.Builder constructor

Reviewed-by: mbaesken, phh, lucy
Backport-of: 3b9255eb663b4c90aa5cec89f0d9380ef8eba49e

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 1 new commit pushed to the master branch:

  • 498d236: 8327474: Review use of java.io.tmpdir in jdk tests

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title Backport 3b9255eb663b4c90aa5cec89f0d9380ef8eba49e 8325851: Hide PassFailJFrame.Builder constructor Oct 29, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 29, 2024

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

@openjdk openjdk bot added backport rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Oct 29, 2024
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Oct 29, 2024

Webrevs

Copy link

@RealLucy RealLucy left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the approval label Oct 29, 2024
@openjdk-notifier openjdk-notifier bot changed the base branch from pr/3012 to master October 30, 2024 10:25
@openjdk-notifier
Copy link

The parent pull request that this pull request depends on has now been integrated and the target branch of this pull request has been updated. This means that changes from the dependent pull request can start to show up as belonging to this pull request, which may be confusing for reviewers. To remedy this situation, simply merge the latest changes from the new target branch into this pull request by running commands similar to these in the local repository for your personal fork:

git checkout goetz_backport_8325851
git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev.git master
git merge FETCH_HEAD
# if there are conflicts, follow the instructions given by git merge
git commit -m "Merge master"
git push

@openjdk openjdk bot added ready Pull request is ready to be integrated and removed approval labels Oct 31, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot removed the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Oct 31, 2024
@GoeLin
Copy link
Member Author

GoeLin commented Oct 31, 2024

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 31, 2024

@GoeLin This pull request has not yet been marked as ready for integration.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Oct 31, 2024
@GoeLin
Copy link
Member Author

GoeLin commented Oct 31, 2024

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 31, 2024

Going to push as commit 0494928.
Since your change was applied there has been 1 commit pushed to the master branch:

  • 498d236: 8327474: Review use of java.io.tmpdir in jdk tests

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Oct 31, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Oct 31, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Oct 31, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 31, 2024

@GoeLin Pushed as commit 0494928.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@GoeLin GoeLin deleted the goetz_backport_8325851 branch October 31, 2024 09:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants