Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8277497: Last column cell in the JTable row is read as empty cell #34

Closed

Conversation

savoptik
Copy link
Contributor

@savoptik savoptik commented Dec 23, 2021

Hi all,

This pull request contains a backport of commit 70bad89b from the openjdk/jdk repository.

The commit being backported was authored by Artem Semenov on 6 Dec 2021 and was reviewed by Anton Tarasov, Alexander Zuev and Pankaj Bansal.

Thanks!


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8277497: Last column cell in the JTable row is read as empty cell

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk17u-dev pull/34/head:pull/34
$ git checkout pull/34

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/34
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk17u-dev pull/34/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 34

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 34

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk17u-dev/pull/34.diff

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Dec 23, 2021

👋 Welcome back asemenov! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title Backport 70bad89b012eb200ca1e76f384a6e5fb307cf26d 8277497: Last column cell in the JTable row is read as empty cell Dec 23, 2021
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 23, 2021

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 23, 2021

@savoptik This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8277497: Last column cell in the JTable row is read as empty cell

Reviewed-by: ant, kizune

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 152 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@forantar, @azuev-java) but any other Committer may sponsor as well.

➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type /integrate in a new comment. (Afterwards, your sponsor types /sponsor in a new comment to perform the integration).

@openjdk openjdk bot added ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Dec 23, 2021
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Dec 23, 2021

Webrevs

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jan 21, 2022

@savoptik This pull request has been inactive for more than 4 weeks and will be automatically closed if another 4 weeks passes without any activity. To avoid this, simply add a new comment to the pull request. Feel free to ask for assistance if you need help with progressing this pull request towards integration!

@savoptik
Copy link
Contributor Author

/integrate

@openjdk openjdk bot added the sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored label Jan 28, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 28, 2022

@savoptik
Your change (at version 846db51) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

@forantar
Copy link

forantar commented Feb 1, 2022

/sponsor

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 1, 2022

Going to push as commit 45002c0.
Since your change was applied there have been 162 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 592adc8: 8278604: SwingSet2 table demo does not have accessible description set for images
  • 952f9c7: 8275645: [JVMCI] avoid unaligned volatile reads on AArch64
  • 869bb36: 8280414: Memory leak in DefaultProxySelector
  • c581598: 8273381: Assert in PtrQueueBufferAllocatorTest.stress_free_list_allocator_vm
  • cb769c0: 8269616: serviceability/dcmd/framework/VMVersionTest.java fails with Address already in use error
  • ac8a550: 8280155: [PPC64, s390] frame size checks are not yet correct
  • 22a6279: 8279924: [PPC64, s390] implement frame::is_interpreted_frame_valid checks
  • 7a5a8ab: 8280526: x86_32 Math.sqrt performance regression with -XX:UseSSE={0,1}
  • d34650a: 8279076: C2: Bad AD file when matching SqrtF with UseSSE=0
  • 3bd7875: 8279445: Update JMH devkit to 1.34
  • ... and 152 more: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk17u-dev/compare/9d0bfe1108c8a264ecf4f841cb426a22f872c85c...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Feb 1, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Feb 1, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored labels Feb 1, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 1, 2022

@forantar @savoptik Pushed as commit 45002c0.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport clean integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants