Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8284458: CodeHeapState::aggregate() leaks blob_name #364

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

zhengyu123
Copy link
Contributor

@zhengyu123 zhengyu123 commented Apr 25, 2022

I would like to backport this patch to 17u to fix a memory leak.

The original patch does not apply cleanly, due to JDK-8275729 and JDK-8276429 that are not in 17u. However, the patch is small and resolved manually.


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • Change must be properly reviewed

Issue

  • JDK-8284458: CodeHeapState::aggregate() leaks blob_name

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk17u-dev pull/364/head:pull/364
$ git checkout pull/364

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/364
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk17u-dev pull/364/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 364

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 364

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk17u-dev/pull/364.diff

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Apr 25, 2022

👋 Welcome back zgu! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title Backport d4a48843856e3d80a58d5a0a26dff6c4d349dca9 8284458: CodeHeapState::aggregate() leaks blob_name Apr 25, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 25, 2022

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

@openjdk openjdk bot added backport rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Apr 25, 2022
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Apr 25, 2022

Webrevs

Copy link
Contributor

@TheRealMDoerr TheRealMDoerr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks like a clean backport except Copyright year change. Good.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 26, 2022

@zhengyu123 This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8284458: CodeHeapState::aggregate() leaks blob_name

Reviewed-by: mdoerr

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 1 new commit pushed to the master branch:

  • 2a799c8: 8283422: Create a new test for JDK-8254790

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Apr 26, 2022
@zhengyu123
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks, @TheRealMDoerr

@zhengyu123
Copy link
Contributor Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 27, 2022

Going to push as commit 1cbe38a.
Since your change was applied there have been 8 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 6793a6a: 8284866: Add test to JDK-8273056
  • 740e6b1: 8278519: serviceability/jvmti/FieldAccessWatch/FieldAccessWatch.java failed "assert(handle != __null) failed: JNI handle should not be null"
  • 6f109a4: 8277396: [TESTBUG] In DefaultButtonModelCrashTest.java, frame is accessed from main thread
  • 11d3c00: 8273095: vmTestbase/vm/mlvm/anonloader/stress/oome/heap/Test.java fails with "wrong OOME"
  • 73c292a: 8282142: [TestCase] compiler/inlining/ResolvedClassTest.java will fail when --with-jvm-features=-compiler1
  • b18783d: 8285342: Zero build failure with clang due to values not handled in switch
  • 90d4233: 8284622: Update versions of some Github Actions used in JDK workflow
  • 2a799c8: 8283422: Create a new test for JDK-8254790

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Apr 27, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Apr 27, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Apr 27, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 27, 2022

@zhengyu123 Pushed as commit 1cbe38a.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport integrated Pull request has been integrated
2 participants