Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8273634: [TEST_BUG] Improve javax/swing/text/ParagraphView/6364882/ #46

wants to merge 1 commit into from


Copy link

@GoeLin GoeLin commented Dec 29, 2021

I backport this for parity with 17.0.3-oracle.


  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue


  • JDK-8273634: [TEST_BUG] Improve javax/swing/text/ParagraphView/6364882/


Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch pull/46/head:pull/46
$ git checkout pull/46

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/46
$ git pull pull/46/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 46

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 46

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:

Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Dec 29, 2021

👋 Welcome back goetz! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title Backport 67e52a3078b0e7e522297c6008f5ac3792937c6a 8273634: [TEST_BUG] Improve javax/swing/text/ParagraphView/6364882/ Dec 29, 2021
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 29, 2021

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 29, 2021

@GoeLin This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8273634: [TEST_BUG] Improve javax/swing/text/ParagraphView/6364882/

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been no new commits pushed to the master branch. If another commit should be pushed before you perform the /integrate command, your PR will be automatically rebased. If you prefer to avoid any potential automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added ready rfr labels Dec 29, 2021
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Dec 29, 2021


Copy link
Member Author

GoeLin commented Jan 5, 2022


Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 5, 2022

Going to push as commit ccb5f86.
Since your change was applied there have been 9 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 8e6ed88: 8239502: [TEST_BUG] Test javax/swing/text/FlowView/6318524/ never fails
  • 7daca99: 8275326: C2: assert(no_dead_loop) failed: dead loop detected
  • 256356d: 8274130: C2: MulNode::Ideal chained transformations may act on wrong nodes
  • 8ce6877: 8279011: JFR: JfrChunkWriter incorrectly handles int64_t chunk size as size_t
  • 0a538a0: 8276662: Scalability bottleneck in SymbolTable::lookup_common()
  • 38f01a7: 8275536: Add test to check that File::lastModified returns same time stamp as Files.getLastModifiedTime
  • 611a0ea: 8273895: compiler/ciReplay/ fails due to wrong data size with TieredStopAtLevel=2,3
  • dcd9821: 8272167: should skip *.dSYM directories
  • 493a78a: 8270874: JFrame paint artifacts when dragged from standard monitor to HiDPI monitor

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated label Jan 5, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Jan 5, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready rfr labels Jan 5, 2022
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 5, 2022

@GoeLin Pushed as commit ccb5f86.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
backport clean integrated
1 participant