8282600: SSLSocketImpl should not use user_canceled workaround when not necessary

[zzambers]

Backport fixing SSLSocket, not to use workaround with user_canceled alert for TLS 1.3 close, when not necessary, as it causes problems with gnutls client.

Applied cleanly. Passed jdk_security tests.

---

Progress

• Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
• Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

• JDK-8282600: SSLSocketImpl should not use user_canceled workaround when not necessary

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev pull/709/head:pull/709
$ git checkout pull/709

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/709
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev pull/709/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 709

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 709

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/709.diff

[bridgekeeper]

👋 Welcome back zzambers! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

[openjdk]

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

[openjdk]

@zzambers This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8282600: SSLSocketImpl should not use user_canceled workaround when not necessary

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 73 new commits pushed to the master branch:

• 6624f71: 8292586: simplify cleanups in NTLMAuthSequence getCredentialsHandle
• ce949ba: 8276904: Optional.toString() is unnecessarily expensive
• ca8e16d: 8284732: FFI_GO_CLOSURES macro not defined but required for zero build on Mac OS X
• 0657a3a: 8280511: AArch64: Combine shift and negate to a single instruction
• 2d4fec4: 8292866: Java_sun_awt_shell_Win32ShellFolder2_getLinkLocation check MultiByteToWideChar return value for failures
• 13ecd42: 8282642: vmTestbase/gc/gctests/LoadUnloadGC2/LoadUnloadGC2.java fails intermittently with exit code 1
• 3d93fdc: 8294357: (tz) Update Timezone Data to 2022d
• 29fea3f: 8291599: Assertion in PhaseIdealLoop::skeleton_predicate_has_opaque after JDK-8289127
• 673b505: 8293816: CI: ciBytecodeStream::get_klass() is not consistent
• 6882bd3: 8293044: C1: Missing access check on non-accessible class
• ... and 63 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/compare/8c5cb310e3d355c85a200235d8dc0db58b9e1a05...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change.

➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type /integrate in a new comment. (Afterwards, your sponsor types /sponsor in a new comment to perform the integration).

[mlbridge]

Webrevs

• 00: Full (fbd420c0)

[zzambers]

/integrate

[openjdk]

@zzambers
Your change (at version fbd420c) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

[GoeLin]

Pre-submit failure: infra issue

[GoeLin]

/sponsor

[openjdk]

Going to push as commit eef3c96.
Since your change was applied there have been 152 commits pushed to the master branch:

• e609398: 8287011: Improve container information
• d5fedc5: 8244670: convert clhsdb "whatis" command from javascript to java
• 5fa5392: 8273578: javax/swing/JMenu/4515762/bug4515762.java fails on macOS 12
• 0698930: 8295288: Some vm_flags tests associate with a wrong BugID
• 9fd15d5: 8233648: [TESTBUG] DefaultMenuBarTest.java failing on macos
• 6a45f75: 8280948: Write a regression test for JDK-4659800
• aa98d09: 8291456: com/sun/jdi/ClassUnloadEventTest.java failed with: Wrong number of class unload events: expected 10 got 4
• 9732004: 8292879: com/sun/jdi/ClassUnloadEventTest.java failed due to classes not unloading
• 8194120: 8292880: Improve debuggee logging for com/sun/jdi/ClassUnloadEventTest.java
• 5977ce5: 8288302: Shenandoah: SIGSEGV in vm maybe related to jit compiling xerces
• ... and 142 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/compare/8c5cb310e3d355c85a200235d8dc0db58b9e1a05...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

[openjdk]

@GoeLin @zzambers Pushed as commit eef3c96.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

[zzambers]

@GoeLin Thank you