Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8268860: Windows-Aarch64 build is failing in GitHub actions #243

Closed

Conversation

shipilev
Copy link
Member

@shipilev shipilev commented Nov 10, 2021

The GHA support for Windows AArch64 was added in 16 by JDK-8256657, then disabled in 17 by JDK-8268861, then enabled back in 18 by this patch. 17u therefore needs to enable Windows AArch64 back for more testing coverage.

Additional testing:

  • Windows AArch64 GHA works (see Checks tab)

Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8268860: Windows-Aarch64 build is failing in GitHub actions

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk17u pull/243/head:pull/243
$ git checkout pull/243

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/243
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk17u pull/243/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 243

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 243

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk17u/pull/243.diff

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Nov 10, 2021

👋 Welcome back shade! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title Backport acc3d995355b646c581623b0df5facbcdbfa4721 8268860: Windows-Aarch64 build is failing in GitHub actions Nov 10, 2021
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 10, 2021

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 10, 2021

@shipilev This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8268860: Windows-Aarch64 build is failing in GitHub actions

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 12 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 16a191c: 8261579: AArch64: Support for weaker memory ordering in Atomic
  • 89a03fe: 8273450: Fix the copyright header of SVML files
  • 6bb5494: 8276572: Fake libsyslookup.so library causes tooling issues
  • 4eeefb4: 8275666: serviceability/jvmti/GetObjectSizeClass.java shouldn't have vm.flagless
  • ed48774: 8274523: java/lang/management/MemoryMXBean/MemoryTest.java test should handle Shenandoah
  • acd939e: 8274522: java/lang/management/ManagementFactory/MXBeanException.java test fails with Shenandoah
  • 0b52b9d: 8276550: Use SHA256 hash in build.tools.depend.Depend
  • 05ad02f: 8268284: javax/swing/JComponent/7154030/bug7154030.java fails with "Exception: Failed to hide opaque button"
  • 143cc64: 8273026: Slow LoginContext.login() on multi threading application
  • aadd484: 8271895: UnProblemList javax/swing/JComponent/7154030/bug7154030.java in JDK18
  • ... and 2 more: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk17u/compare/e829c856b738d03db3ab210d3bde24b83af633cb...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Nov 10, 2021
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Nov 10, 2021

Webrevs

@shipilev
Copy link
Member Author

Got the push approval.

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 16, 2021

Going to push as commit cc09778.
Since your change was applied there have been 24 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • e4425d8: 8276157: C2: Compiler stack overflow during escape analysis on Linux x86_32
  • 6221d61: 8276112: Inconsistent scalar replacement debug info at safepoints
  • 24c7fe3: 8268294: Reusing HttpClient in a WebSocket.Listener hangs.
  • b2f4dff: 8269481: SctpMultiChannel never releases own file descriptor
  • c3de885: 8273416: C2: assert(false) failed: bad AD file after JDK-8252372 with UseSSE={0,1}
  • ff4f533: 8274560: JFR: Add test for OldObjectSample event when using Shenandoah
  • 23b4496: 8268927: Windows: link error: unresolved external symbol "int __cdecl convert_to_unicode(char const *,wchar_t * *)"
  • a1036ef: 8274606: Fix jaxp/javax/xml/jaxp/unittest/transform/SurrogateTest.java test
  • 193c7f1: 8274501: c2i entry barriers read int as long on AArch64
  • 3e349b4: 8276025: Hotspot's libsvml.so may conflict with user dependency
  • ... and 14 more: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk17u/compare/e829c856b738d03db3ab210d3bde24b83af633cb...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Nov 16, 2021
@openjdk openjdk bot added integrated Pull request has been integrated and removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Nov 16, 2021
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 16, 2021

@shipilev Pushed as commit cc09778.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@shipilev shipilev deleted the JDK-8268860-windows-aarch64 branch December 20, 2021 08:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport clean integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant