Navigation Menu

Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Feb 2, 2023. It is now read-only.

8280867: Cpuid1Ecx feature parsing is incorrect for AMD CPUs #70

Closed

Conversation

TobiHartmann
Copy link
Member

@TobiHartmann TobiHartmann commented Mar 29, 2022

Backport of JDK-8280867. Applies cleanly. Approval is pending.

Thanks,
Tobias


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8280867: Cpuid1Ecx feature parsing is incorrect for AMD CPUs

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk18u pull/70/head:pull/70
$ git checkout pull/70

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/70
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk18u pull/70/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 70

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 70

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk18u/pull/70.diff

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Mar 29, 2022

👋 Welcome back thartmann! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title Backport a18beb4797a1ca6fc6b31e997be48b2bd91c6ac0 8280867: Cpuid1Ecx feature parsing is incorrect for AMD CPUs Mar 29, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 29, 2022

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 29, 2022

@TobiHartmann This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8280867: Cpuid1Ecx feature parsing is incorrect for AMD CPUs

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been no new commits pushed to the master branch. If another commit should be pushed before you perform the /integrate command, your PR will be automatically rebased. If you prefer to avoid any potential automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Mar 29, 2022
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Mar 29, 2022

Webrevs

@TobiHartmann
Copy link
Member Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 4, 2022

Going to push as commit 2635615.
Since your change was applied there have been 16 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 43be343: 8283641: Large value for CompileThresholdScaling causes assert
  • 515a947: 8282592: C2: assert(false) failed: graph should be schedulable
  • 092ad51: 8282874: Bad performance on gather/scatter API caused by different IntSpecies of indexMap
  • 617f190: 8280799: С2: assert(false) failed: cyclic dependency prevents range check elimination
  • 7613335: 8256368: Avoid repeated upcalls into Java to re-resolve MH/VH linkers/invokers
  • 074b635: 8271008: appcds/*/MethodHandlesAsCollectorTest.java tests time out because of excessive GC (CodeCache GC Threshold) in loom
  • a81c911: 8281822: Test failures on non-DTrace builds due to incomplete DTrace* flags handling
  • e6c08ad: 8281266: [JVMCI] MetaUtil.toInternalName() doesn't handle hidden classes correctly
  • 8f4dbe5: 8282887: Potential memory leak in sun.util.locale.provider.HostLocaleProviderAdapterImpl.getNumberPattern() on Windows
  • 3ace021: 8282628: Potential memory leak in sun.font.FontConfigManager.getFontConfig()
  • ... and 6 more: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk18u/compare/9327634e982314733f4126a1106be8e452f19f58...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Apr 4, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Apr 4, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Apr 4, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 4, 2022

@TobiHartmann Pushed as commit 2635615.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
backport clean integrated Pull request has been integrated
2 participants