Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Sep 19, 2023. It is now read-only.
/ jdk19 Public archive

8288303: C1: Miscompilation due to broken Class.getModifiers intrinsic #8

Closed
wants to merge 6 commits into from
Closed

8288303: C1: Miscompilation due to broken Class.getModifiers intrinsic #8

wants to merge 6 commits into from

Conversation

shipilev
Copy link
Member

@shipilev shipilev commented Jun 13, 2022

Looks like another instance when compilicated control flow in C1 LIR intrinsic confuses the C1 regalloc into miscompiling. Reliably reproduces on selected JFR tests in selected configurations, and I was unable to reproduce it in smaller test.

Additional testing:

  • JFR reproducers now pass
  • Linux x86_64 fastdebug tier1
  • Linux x86_32 fastdebug tier1
  • Linux x86_64 fastdebug tier2
  • Linux x86_32 fastdebug tier2

Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8288303: C1: Miscompilation due to broken Class.getModifiers intrinsic

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk19 pull/8/head:pull/8
$ git checkout pull/8

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/8
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk19 pull/8/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 8

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 8

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk19/pull/8.diff

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jun 13, 2022

👋 Welcome back shade! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Jun 13, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 13, 2022

@shipilev The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot-compiler

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the hotspot-compiler hotspot-compiler-dev@openjdk.org label Jun 13, 2022
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Jun 13, 2022

Webrevs

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 13, 2022

@shipilev This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8288303: C1: Miscompilation due to broken Class.getModifiers intrinsic

Reviewed-by: iveresov, dlong

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 2 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 53ef59c: 8288365: ProblemList java/lang/reflect/callerCache/ReflectionCallerCacheTest.java in -Xcomp on macosx-x64 and windows-x64
  • 7aafc69: 8288105: [PPC64] Problems with -XX:+VerifyStack

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Jun 13, 2022
@shipilev
Copy link
Member Author

shipilev commented Jun 13, 2022

Curiously, I deliberately broke the intrinisic in one of my experiments and realized no test caught it! So I added a test for intrinsic as well... The original patch has the test that exercises the canonicalization path, but not the intrinsification path.

Copy link
Member

@dean-long dean-long left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The change looks OK. However, it does seem useful for an intrinsic to be able to use "local" labels that won't confuse the register allocator. That seems better than using a less-efficient cmove or having to write the intrinsic at the LIRAssembler level.

@shipilev
Copy link
Member Author

The change looks OK. However, it does seem useful for an intrinsic to be able to use "local" labels that won't confuse the register allocator. That seems better than using a less-efficient cmove or having to write the intrinsic at the LIRAssembler level.

Yeah, this is not the first time this happens. So I submitted JDK-8288317 yesterday hoping for better diagnostics, at least. Maybe local labels would be nice to have, if they are implementable.

@shipilev
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks for reviews!

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 14, 2022

Going to push as commit 8cd87e7.
Since your change was applied there have been 3 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • c76a06a: 8288214: serviceability/jvmti/vthread/VThreadNotifyFramePopTest/VThreadNotifyFramePopTest.java test failed
  • 53ef59c: 8288365: ProblemList java/lang/reflect/callerCache/ReflectionCallerCacheTest.java in -Xcomp on macosx-x64 and windows-x64
  • 7aafc69: 8288105: [PPC64] Problems with -XX:+VerifyStack

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Jun 14, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Jun 14, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Jun 14, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 14, 2022

@shipilev Pushed as commit 8cd87e7.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@shipilev shipilev deleted the JDK-8288303-c1-class-getmodifiers branch June 22, 2022 17:05
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
hotspot-compiler hotspot-compiler-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants