Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Sep 19, 2023. It is now read-only.
/ jdk19u Public archive

8290529: C2: assert(BoolTest(btest).is_canonical()) failure #37

Closed

Conversation

TobiHartmann
Copy link
Member

@TobiHartmann TobiHartmann commented Sep 22, 2022

Backport of JDK-8290529. Applies cleanly except for a change to surrounding code in IRNode.java. Approval is pending.

Thanks,
Tobias


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8290529: C2: assert(BoolTest(btest).is_canonical()) failure

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk19u pull/37/head:pull/37
$ git checkout pull/37

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/37
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk19u pull/37/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 37

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 37

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk19u/pull/37.diff

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Sep 22, 2022

👋 Welcome back thartmann! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title Backport 77e21c57ce00463db4cc3d87f93729cbfe2c96b4 8290529: C2: assert(BoolTest(btest).is_canonical()) failure Sep 22, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 22, 2022

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 22, 2022

@TobiHartmann This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8290529: C2: assert(BoolTest(btest).is_canonical()) failure

Reviewed-by: kvn

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 19 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 3d1cabb: 8294517: Update jdk19u fix version to 19.0.2
  • a1cc5be: 8288377: [REDO] DST not applying properly with zone id offset set with TZ env variable
  • e102312: 8293834: Update CLDR data following tzdata 2022c update
  • 7f34799: 8291508: Fix some tests with "requires vm.jvmti & vm.continuations"
  • 59a331a: 8290496: riscv: Fix build warnings-as-errors with GCC 11
  • 30294b3: 8286314: Trampoline not created for far runtime targets outside small CodeCache
  • d0b021b: 8288992: AArch64: CMN should be handled the same way as CMP
  • e6bd2c9: 8290246: test fails "assert(init != __null) failed: initialization not found"
  • 27158f2: 8290451: Incorrect result when switching to C2 OSR compilation from C1
  • 83cb884: 8290711: assert(false) failed: infinite loop in PhaseIterGVN::optimize
  • ... and 9 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk19u/compare/903c21b0268f7c5e3bfd3ae69328b864fb3cc65c...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Sep 22, 2022
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Sep 22, 2022

Webrevs

@TobiHartmann
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks, Vladimir!

@TobiHartmann
Copy link
Member Author

Testing revealed that the definition of CMP_U is missing in IRNode.java. I added it.

@openjdk openjdk bot removed the clean label Sep 23, 2022
@TobiHartmann
Copy link
Member Author

I had to remove IR verification from the test because JDK-8283726 is not in JDK 19u.

Copy link

@vnkozlov vnkozlov left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Still good.

@TobiHartmann
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks, Vladimir!

@TobiHartmann
Copy link
Member Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 29, 2022

Going to push as commit 152d2f1.
Since your change was applied there have been 19 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 3d1cabb: 8294517: Update jdk19u fix version to 19.0.2
  • a1cc5be: 8288377: [REDO] DST not applying properly with zone id offset set with TZ env variable
  • e102312: 8293834: Update CLDR data following tzdata 2022c update
  • 7f34799: 8291508: Fix some tests with "requires vm.jvmti & vm.continuations"
  • 59a331a: 8290496: riscv: Fix build warnings-as-errors with GCC 11
  • 30294b3: 8286314: Trampoline not created for far runtime targets outside small CodeCache
  • d0b021b: 8288992: AArch64: CMN should be handled the same way as CMP
  • e6bd2c9: 8290246: test fails "assert(init != __null) failed: initialization not found"
  • 27158f2: 8290451: Incorrect result when switching to C2 OSR compilation from C1
  • 83cb884: 8290711: assert(false) failed: infinite loop in PhaseIterGVN::optimize
  • ... and 9 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk19u/compare/903c21b0268f7c5e3bfd3ae69328b864fb3cc65c...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Sep 29, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Sep 29, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Sep 29, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 29, 2022

@TobiHartmann Pushed as commit 152d2f1.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
backport integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants