8299500: Usage of constructors of primitive wrapper classes should be avoided in java.text API docs

[justin-curtis-lu]

This pull request contains a backport of commit cd10c727 from the openjdk/jdk repository.

The commit being backported was authored by Justin Lu on 9 Jan 2023 and was reviewed by Naoto Sato and Lance Andersen.

Thanks!

---

Progress

• Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
• Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

• JDK-8299500: Usage of constructors of primitive wrapper classes should be avoided in java.text API docs

Reviewers

• Iris Clark (@irisclark - Reviewer)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk20 pull/106/head:pull/106
$ git checkout pull/106

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/106
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk20 pull/106/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 106

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 106

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk20/pull/106.diff

[bridgekeeper]

👋 Welcome back jlu! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

[openjdk]

@justin-curtis-lu The following labels will be automatically applied to this pull request:

• core-libs
• i18n

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing lists. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

[mlbridge]

Webrevs

• 00: Full (df0087fc)

[openjdk]

@justin-curtis-lu This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8299500: Usage of constructors of primitive wrapper classes should be avoided in java.text API docs

Reviewed-by: iris

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 1 new commit pushed to the master branch:

• bc498f8: 8300141: ProblemList java/util/concurrent/locks/Lock/OOMEInAQS.java with ZGC

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@irisclark) but any other Committer may sponsor as well.

➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type /integrate in a new comment. (Afterwards, your sponsor types /sponsor in a new comment to perform the integration).

[openjdk]

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

[justin-curtis-lu]

/integrate

[openjdk]

@justin-curtis-lu
Your change (at version df0087f) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

[naotoj]

/sponsor

[openjdk]

Going to push as commit 98eae6d.
Since your change was applied there have been 3 commits pushed to the master branch:

• 628266a: 8299501: Usage of constructors of primitive wrapper classes should be avoided in java.util API docs
• ab7f43f: 8299498: Usage of constructors of primitive wrapper classes should be avoided in java.lang API docs
• bc498f8: 8300141: ProblemList java/util/concurrent/locks/Lock/OOMEInAQS.java with ZGC

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

[openjdk]

@naotoj @justin-curtis-lu Pushed as commit 98eae6d.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.