Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 24, 2023. It is now read-only.
/ jdk20 Public archive

8288204: GVN Crash: assert() failed: correct memory chain #80

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

TobiHartmann
Copy link
Member

@TobiHartmann TobiHartmann commented Jan 3, 2023

Backport of JDK-8288204. Applies cleanly.

Thanks,
Tobias


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8288204: GVN Crash: assert() failed: correct memory chain

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk20 pull/80/head:pull/80
$ git checkout pull/80

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/80
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk20 pull/80/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 80

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 80

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk20/pull/80.diff

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jan 3, 2023

👋 Welcome back thartmann! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title Backport 04591595374e84cfbfe38d92bff4409105b28009 8288204: GVN Crash: assert() failed: correct memory chain Jan 3, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 3, 2023

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 3, 2023

@TobiHartmann This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8288204: GVN Crash: assert() failed: correct memory chain

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been no new commits pushed to the master branch. If another commit should be pushed before you perform the /integrate command, your PR will be automatically rebased. If you prefer to avoid any potential automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Jan 3, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 3, 2023

@TobiHartmann The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot-compiler

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the hotspot-compiler hotspot-compiler-dev@openjdk.org label Jan 3, 2023
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Jan 3, 2023

Webrevs

@TobiHartmann
Copy link
Member Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 3, 2023

Going to push as commit a6a903d.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Jan 3, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Jan 3, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Jan 3, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 3, 2023

@TobiHartmann Pushed as commit a6a903d.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
backport clean hotspot-compiler hotspot-compiler-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants