8311593: Minor doc issue in MemorySegment::copy

[mcimadamore]

Clean backport of https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14813
(sorry for filing another one, I realized there was an issue with the JBS issues pointing the wrong way)

---

Progress

• Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
• Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
• Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

• JDK-8311593: Minor doc issue in MemorySegment::copy (Bug - P4)

Reviewers

• Jorn Vernee (@JornVernee - Reviewer)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21.git pull/109/head:pull/109
$ git checkout pull/109

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/109
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21.git pull/109/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 109

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 109

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21/pull/109.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

[bridgekeeper]

👋 Welcome back mcimadamore! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

[openjdk]

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

[openjdk]

@mcimadamore The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

• core-libs

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

[mlbridge]

Webrevs

• 00: Full (3b18f3f6)

[openjdk]

@mcimadamore This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8311593: Minor doc issue in MemorySegment::copy

Reviewed-by: jvernee

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 1 new commit pushed to the master branch:

• 8808ec3: 8311548: AArch64: [ZGC] Many tests fail with "assert(allocates2(pc)) failed: not in CodeBuffer memory" on some CPUs

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

[mcimadamore]

/integrate

[openjdk]

Going to push as commit ca10804.
Since your change was applied there have been 4 commits pushed to the master branch:

• 480dc22: 8311689: Wrong visible amount in Adjustable of ScrollPane
• 308b4c6: 8302351: "assert(!JavaThread::current()->is_interp_only_mode() || !nm->method()->is_continuation_enter_intrinsic() || ContinuationEntry::is_interpreted_call(return_pc)) failed: interp_only_mode but not in enterSpecial interpreted entry" in fixup_callers_callsite
• c97db0d: 8311245: JFR: Remove t.printStackTrace() in PeriodicEvents
• 8808ec3: 8311548: AArch64: [ZGC] Many tests fail with "assert(allocates2(pc)) failed: not in CodeBuffer memory" on some CPUs

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

[openjdk]

@mcimadamore Pushed as commit ca10804.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.