8303916: ThreadLists.java inconsistent results

[kevinjwalls]

Clean backport from latest jdk repo to jdk21 for the test change:
8303916: ThreadLists.java inconsistent results

---

Progress

• Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
• Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
• Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

• JDK-8303916: ThreadLists.java inconsistent results (Bug - P4)

Reviewers

• Serguei Spitsyn (@sspitsyn - Reviewer)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21.git pull/24/head:pull/24
$ git checkout pull/24

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/24
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21.git pull/24/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 24

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 24

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21/pull/24.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

[bridgekeeper]

👋 Welcome back kevinw! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

[openjdk]

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

[openjdk]

@kevinjwalls The following labels will be automatically applied to this pull request:

• core-libs
• serviceability

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing lists. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

[mlbridge]

Webrevs

• 00: Full (617a1103)

[kevinjwalls]

/label remove core-libs

[openjdk]

@kevinjwalls
The core-libs label was successfully removed.

[AlanBateman]

/label remove core-libs

[openjdk]

@AlanBateman The core-libs label was not set.

[sspitsyn]

The backport looks clean.
Thanks,
Serguei

[openjdk]

@kevinjwalls This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8303916: ThreadLists.java inconsistent results

Reviewed-by: sspitsyn

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 16 new commits pushed to the master branch:

• beb0d95: 8310054: ScrollPane insets are incorrect
• e0cc401: 8310019: MIPS builds are broken after JDK-8304913
• 7e78893: 8310105: LoongArch64 builds are broken after JDK-8304913
• fb6f5f1: 8309228: Clarify EXPERIMENTAL flags comment in hotspot/share/runtime/globals.hpp
• 7ca0f14: 8309957: Rename JDK-8309595 test to conform
• bfffd8b: 8309595: Allow javadoc to process unnamed classes
• ede16cd: 8310314: Misplaced "unnamed classes are a preview feature and are disabled by default" error
• 08965e6: 8310259: Pin msys2/setup-msys2 github action to a specific commit
• e0d3706: 8304835: jdk/jfr/event/oldobject/TestArrayInformation.java fails with "Could not find event with class ... as (leak) object"
• 14c5091: 8310015: ZGC: Unbounded asynchronous unmapping can lead to running out of address space
• ... and 6 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21/compare/39e98e7bbf278b8772350fd28d2bd8ad8cb06315...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

[kevinjwalls]

/integrate

[openjdk]

Going to push as commit 8d9ebb6.
Since your change was applied there have been 49 commits pushed to the master branch:

• 0903c8d: 8310194: Generational ZGC: Lock-order asserts in JVMTI IterateThroughHeap
• 9998c07: 8310459: [BACKOUT] 8304450: [vectorapi] Refactor VectorShuffle implementation
• 3248dae: 8310830: typo in the parameter name in @throws of ClassDesc::ofDescriptor
• 033060b: 8310975: java.util.FormatItemModifier should not be protected
• df26258: 8310182: DateTimeFormatter date formats (ISO_LOCAL_DATE) separated with hyphen, not dash
• 087d4a8: 8309258: RISC-V: Add riscv_hwprobe syscall
• 6a4552c: 8310242: Clarify the name parameter to Class::forName
• 71a41f7: 8310861: Improve location reporting for javac serial lint warnings
• cdb8c70: 8309670: java -help output for --module-path / -p is incomplete
• 8748b46: 8309471: Limit key characters in static index pages
• ... and 39 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21/compare/39e98e7bbf278b8772350fd28d2bd8ad8cb06315...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

[openjdk]

@kevinjwalls Pushed as commit 8d9ebb6.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.