-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 92
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
8318696: Do not use LFS64 symbols on Linux
Reviewed-by: lucy Backport-of: f4d08ccf80812d4f26a148fac6bf99b96672a63f
- Loading branch information
Showing
5 changed files
with
25 additions
and
20 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
2697a9d
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Review
Issues
2697a9d
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/backport jdk17u-dev
2697a9d
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@MBaesken Could not automatically backport
2697a9d1
to openjdk/jdk17u-dev due to conflicts in the following files:Please fetch the appropriate branch/commit and manually resolve these conflicts by using the following commands in your personal fork of openjdk/jdk17u-dev. Note: these commands are just some suggestions and you can use other equivalent commands you know.
Once you have resolved the conflicts as explained above continue with creating a pull request towards the openjdk/jdk17u-dev with the title
Backport 2697a9d1c288daaddae751a7e8a2d2239c5d884c
.Below you can find a suggestion for the pull request body:
2697a9d
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/backport jdk17u-dev
2697a9d
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@MBaesken Could not automatically backport
2697a9d1
to openjdk/jdk17u-dev due to conflicts in the following files:Please fetch the appropriate branch/commit and manually resolve these conflicts by using the following commands in your personal fork of openjdk/jdk17u-dev. Note: these commands are just some suggestions and you can use other equivalent commands you know.
Once you have resolved the conflicts as explained above continue with creating a pull request towards the openjdk/jdk17u-dev with the title
Backport 2697a9d1c288daaddae751a7e8a2d2239c5d884c
.Below you can find a suggestion for the pull request body: