Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8346972: Test java/nio/channels/FileChannel/LoopingTruncate.java fails sometimes with IOException: There is not enough space on the disk #1394

Conversation

sendaoYan
Copy link
Member

@sendaoYan sendaoYan commented Feb 11, 2025

Hi all,

This pull request contains a backport of commit a07d7849 from the openjdk/jdk24u repository to jdk21u-dev.

This backport make test more rubustness, test-fix only, no risk.

Thanks!


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • JDK-8346972 needs maintainer approval

Issue

  • JDK-8346972: Test java/nio/channels/FileChannel/LoopingTruncate.java fails sometimes with IOException: There is not enough space on the disk (Bug - P4 - Approved)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev.git pull/1394/head:pull/1394
$ git checkout pull/1394

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/1394
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev.git pull/1394/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 1394

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 1394

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/1394.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Feb 11, 2025

👋 Welcome back syan! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 11, 2025

@sendaoYan This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8346972: Test java/nio/channels/FileChannel/LoopingTruncate.java fails sometimes with IOException: There is not enough space on the disk

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 6 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 4e19a9b: 8339834: Replace usages of -mx and -ms in some tests
  • 4f4c3ce: 8347038: [JMH] jdk.incubator.vector.SpiltReplicate fails NoClassDefFoundError
  • eb82472: 8346587: Distrust TLS server certificates anchored by Camerfirma Root CAs
  • 37ad4db: 8346713: [testsuite] NeverActAsServerClassMachine breaks TestPLABAdaptToMinTLABSize.java TestPinnedHumongousFragmentation.java TestPinnedObjectContents.java
  • 3e55649: 8345368: java/io/File/createTempFile/SpecialTempFile.java fails on Windows Server 2025
  • e122829: 8346671: java/nio/file/Files/probeContentType/Basic.java fails on Windows 2025

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title Backport a07d784919ae232a890bf79de27b8623e294ad20 8346972: Test java/nio/channels/FileChannel/LoopingTruncate.java fails sometimes with IOException: There is not enough space on the disk Feb 11, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 11, 2025

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 11, 2025

⚠️ @sendaoYan This change is now ready for you to apply for maintainer approval. This can be done directly in each associated issue or by using the /approval command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Feb 11, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Feb 11, 2025

Webrevs

@sendaoYan
Copy link
Member Author

/approval request Clean backport make test more rubustness, test-fix only, no risk.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 13, 2025

@sendaoYan
8346972: The approval request has been created successfully.

@openjdk openjdk bot added approval ready Pull request is ready to be integrated and removed approval labels Feb 13, 2025
@sendaoYan
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks for the approved.

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 13, 2025

Going to push as commit 8b4ee65.
Since your change was applied there have been 11 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • cc142d4: 8347171: (dc) java/nio/channels/DatagramChannel/InterruptibleOrNot.java fails with virtual thread factory
  • 37ad92f: 8343882: BasicAnnoTests doesn't handle multiple annotations at the same position
  • 41dcb8c: 8347740: java/io/File/createTempFile/SpecialTempFile.java failing
  • 17cb53a: 8302111: Serialization considerations
  • 072651a: 8319233: AArch64: Build failure with clang due to -Wformat-nonliteral warning
  • 4e19a9b: 8339834: Replace usages of -mx and -ms in some tests
  • 4f4c3ce: 8347038: [JMH] jdk.incubator.vector.SpiltReplicate fails NoClassDefFoundError
  • eb82472: 8346587: Distrust TLS server certificates anchored by Camerfirma Root CAs
  • 37ad4db: 8346713: [testsuite] NeverActAsServerClassMachine breaks TestPLABAdaptToMinTLABSize.java TestPinnedHumongousFragmentation.java TestPinnedObjectContents.java
  • 3e55649: 8345368: java/io/File/createTempFile/SpecialTempFile.java fails on Windows Server 2025
  • ... and 1 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/compare/9c8fe67afff3a275c2e5944e996ce3f32ae53b37...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Feb 13, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Feb 13, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Feb 13, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 13, 2025

@sendaoYan Pushed as commit 8b4ee65.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport clean integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant