Skip to content

8355077: Compiler error at splashscreen_gif.c due to unterminated string initialization#1831

Closed
jankratochvil wants to merge 2 commits intoopenjdk:masterfrom
jankratochvil:8355077
Closed

8355077: Compiler error at splashscreen_gif.c due to unterminated string initialization#1831
jankratochvil wants to merge 2 commits intoopenjdk:masterfrom
jankratochvil:8355077

Conversation

@jankratochvil
Copy link

@jankratochvil jankratochvil commented May 25, 2025


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • JDK-8355077 needs maintainer approval

Issue

  • JDK-8355077: Compiler error at splashscreen_gif.c due to unterminated string initialization (Bug - P4 - Approved)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev.git pull/1831/head:pull/1831
$ git checkout pull/1831

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/1831
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev.git pull/1831/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 1831

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 1831

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/1831.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented May 25, 2025

👋 Welcome back jkratochvil! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 25, 2025

@jankratochvil This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8355077: Compiler error at splashscreen_gif.c due to unterminated string initialization

Reviewed-by: lbourges

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 3 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • dd842c4: 8349988: Change cgroup version detection logic to not depend on /proc/cgroups
  • 7ef2dfd: 8354233: Open some JTable bugs 6
  • 20e9f61: 8354095: Open some JTable bugs 5

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@bourgesl) but any other Committer may sponsor as well.

➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type /integrate in a new comment. (Afterwards, your sponsor types /sponsor in a new comment to perform the integration).

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title Backport 898d4798003d7b9cd54ef3a149eb037998a39887 8355077: Compiler error at splashscreen_gif.c due to unterminated string initialization May 25, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 25, 2025

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

@openjdk openjdk bot added backport Port of a pull request already in a different code base clean Identical backport; no merge resolution required labels May 25, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 25, 2025

⚠️ @jankratochvil This change is now ready for you to apply for maintainer approval. This can be done directly in each associated issue or by using the /approval command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label May 25, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented May 25, 2025

Webrevs

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jun 22, 2025

@jankratochvil This pull request has been inactive for more than 4 weeks and will be automatically closed if another 4 weeks passes without any activity. To avoid this, simply issue a /touch or /keepalive command to the pull request. Feel free to ask for assistance if you need help with progressing this pull request towards integration!

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jul 20, 2025

@jankratochvil This pull request has been inactive for more than 8 weeks and will now be automatically closed. If you would like to continue working on this pull request in the future, feel free to reopen it! This can be done using the /open pull request command.

@bridgekeeper bridgekeeper bot closed this Jul 20, 2025
@jankratochvil
Copy link
Author

/open

@openjdk openjdk bot reopened this Jul 21, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 21, 2025

@jankratochvil This pull request is now open

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Aug 18, 2025

@jankratochvil This pull request has been inactive for more than 4 weeks and will be automatically closed if another 4 weeks passes without any activity. To avoid this, simply issue a /touch or /keepalive command to the pull request. Feel free to ask for assistance if you need help with progressing this pull request towards integration!

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Sep 16, 2025

@jankratochvil This pull request has been inactive for more than 8 weeks and will now be automatically closed. If you would like to continue working on this pull request in the future, feel free to reopen it! This can be done using the /open pull request command.

@bridgekeeper bridgekeeper bot closed this Sep 16, 2025
@jankratochvil
Copy link
Author

/open

@openjdk openjdk bot reopened this Oct 16, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 16, 2025

@jankratochvil This pull request is now open

@openjdk openjdk bot added approval Requires approval; will be removed when approval is received ready Pull request is ready to be integrated and removed approval Requires approval; will be removed when approval is received labels Oct 17, 2025
@jankratochvil
Copy link
Author

/integrate

@openjdk openjdk bot added the sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored label Oct 20, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 20, 2025

@jankratochvil
Your change (at version 1638293) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

@shipilev
Copy link
Member

As the matter of course, for the older PRs like these, you need to merge from the recent master before integrating. Otherwise there is a risk of introducing a build failure due to bad merge. The risk here seems low, but nevertheless. Bots currently say: "At the time when this comment was updated there had been 496 new commits pushed to the master branch:"

@openjdk openjdk bot removed the sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored label Oct 30, 2025
@shipilev
Copy link
Member

shipilev commented Oct 30, 2025

I think you are fine now, thanks! Ask bots to integrate again.

@jankratochvil
Copy link
Author

/integrate

@openjdk openjdk bot added the sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored label Oct 31, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 31, 2025

@jankratochvil
Your change (at version 42d1b35) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

@GoeLin
Copy link
Member

GoeLin commented Oct 31, 2025

/sponsor

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 31, 2025

Going to push as commit e324954.
Since your change was applied there have been 6 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Oct 31, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Oct 31, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored labels Oct 31, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 31, 2025

@GoeLin @jankratochvil Pushed as commit e324954.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

backport Port of a pull request already in a different code base clean Identical backport; no merge resolution required integrated Pull request has been integrated

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants