-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 92
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8320707: Virtual thread test updates #328
Conversation
👋 Welcome back shade! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit. |
Webrevs
|
GHA x86_32 tests are failing, I think we need #330 first. |
Grr, the x86_32 thing does not work. Getting back to draft until I can figure it out. |
@shipilev This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 29 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
fc6dd1f
to
05d454d
Compare
05d454d
to
1775292
Compare
Seems fine to me. |
Being a good citizen would need a 22u backport first. |
Thanks!
Not sure we want to do tests maintenance in a soon-to-be-dead release, but here it is: openjdk/jdk22u#160 |
/approval request Test-only backport that simplifies Loom maintenance. The original commit applies cleanly, but does not work, because tests use FFM that are not stable in JDK 21, rewritten back to synchronized. See 21u PR for more details. Loom tests pass. Low risk, test-only change. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good!
Nice idea to use synchronized (runner)
.
/integrate |
Going to push as commit 41237fc.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
Test-only backport that simplifies Loom maintenance. The original commit applies cleanly, but it does not work out of the box, because
VThreadPinner
uses FFM, which is a preview feature in JDK 21, made final in JDK 22. My attempts to soft-touch FFM into working in JDK 21 with these tests failed: x86_32's fallback linker does not work properly in JDK 21, so tests cannot complete there.Therefore, I made a side-ways move here: rewrote
VThreadPinner
to usesynchronized
, which still pins the thread in JDK 21, and would likely continue doing so. It is unlikely we would backport the runtime changes required to avoid pinning on synchronized blocks. This is what the old tests did anyway.This would also make subsequent backports clean.
Additional testing:
jdk_loom hotspot_loom
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev.git pull/328/head:pull/328
$ git checkout pull/328
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/328
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev.git pull/328/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 328
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 328
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/328.diff
Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment