8322503: Shenandoah: Clarify gc state usage

[earthling-amzn]

Resolved trivial conflicts

---

Progress

• Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
• Commit message must refer to an issue
• JDK-8322503 needs maintainer approval

Issue

• JDK-8322503: Shenandoah: Clarify gc state usage (Enhancement - P4 - Approved)

Reviewers

• Aleksey Shipilev (@shipilev - Reviewer)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev.git pull/365/head:pull/365
$ git checkout pull/365

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/365
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev.git pull/365/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 365

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 365

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/365.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

[bridgekeeper]

👋 Welcome back wkemper! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

[openjdk]

@earthling-amzn This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8322503: Shenandoah: Clarify gc state usage

Reviewed-by: shade

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 1 new commit pushed to the master branch:

• 93fd1a1: 8324238: [macOS] java/awt/Frame/ShapeNotSetSometimes/ShapeNotSetSometimes.java fails with the shape has not been applied msg

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@shipilev) but any other Committer may sponsor as well.

➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type /integrate in a new comment. (Afterwards, your sponsor types /sponsor in a new comment to perform the integration).

[openjdk]

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

[openjdk]

⚠️ @earthling-amzn This change is now ready for you to apply for maintainer approval. This can be done directly in each associated issue or by using the /approval command.

[mlbridge]

Webrevs

• 00: Full (d445df6d)

[shipilev]

Looks good.

[earthling-amzn]

/approval request This is a follow up to JDK-8321815. It renames methods, improves comments, and adds an assert. I believe the risk is low. I also believe these GHA failures are unrelated to this change.

[openjdk]

@earthling-amzn
8322503: The approval request has been created successfully.

[earthling-amzn]

/integrate

[openjdk]

@earthling-amzn
Your change (at version d445df6) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

[shipilev]

I agree GHA failures look unrelated to this PR.

/sponsor

[openjdk]

Going to push as commit e3b6098.
Since your change was applied there has been 1 commit pushed to the master branch:

• 93fd1a1: 8324238: [macOS] java/awt/Frame/ShapeNotSetSometimes/ShapeNotSetSometimes.java fails with the shape has not been applied msg

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

[openjdk]

@shipilev @earthling-amzn Pushed as commit e3b6098.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.