Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8317677: Specialize Vtablestubs::entry_for() for VtableBlob #432

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

GoeLin
Copy link
Member

@GoeLin GoeLin commented Apr 2, 2024

I backport this for parity with 21.0.4-oracle.


Progress

  • JDK-8317677 needs maintainer approval
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8317677: Specialize Vtablestubs::entry_for() for VtableBlob (Enhancement - P4 - Approved)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev.git pull/432/head:pull/432
$ git checkout pull/432

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/432
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev.git pull/432/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 432

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 432

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/432.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Apr 2, 2024

👋 Welcome back goetz! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 2, 2024

@GoeLin This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8317677: Specialize Vtablestubs::entry_for() for VtableBlob

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 6 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 9e6fb82: 8328592: hprof tests fail with -XX:-CompactStrings
  • 342ae64: 8319876: Reduce memory consumption of VM_ThreadDump::doit
  • 4c7b1d9: 8313710: jcmd: typo in the documentation of JFR.start and JFR.dump
  • 0bbb803: 8318727: Enable parallelism in vmTestbase/vm/gc/concurrent tests
  • f5dfd8b: 8311823: JFR: Uninitialized EventEmitter::_thread_id field
  • d17aa5e: 8319437: NMT should show library names in call stacks

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title Backport 1082c0e767a5060d1969edc5ef16f9974e799960 8317677: Specialize Vtablestubs::entry_for() for VtableBlob Apr 2, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 2, 2024

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 2, 2024

⚠️ @GoeLin This change is now ready for you to apply for maintainer approval. This can be done directly in each associated issue or by using the /approval command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Apr 2, 2024
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Apr 2, 2024

Webrevs

@openjdk openjdk bot added approval ready Pull request is ready to be integrated and removed approval labels Apr 3, 2024
@GoeLin
Copy link
Member Author

GoeLin commented Apr 3, 2024

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 3, 2024

Going to push as commit c094d7e.
Since your change was applied there have been 14 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 0839687: 8317235: Remove Access API use in nmethod class
  • 32ab4a2: 8316669: ImmutableOopMapSet destructor not called
  • 7c5ff9a: 8316670: Remove effectively unused nmethodBucket::_count
  • 92b237c: 8315485: (fs) Move java/nio/file/Path/Misc.java tests into java/nio/file/Path/PathOps.java
  • 618a7ba: 8315998: Remove dead ClassLoaderDataGraphKlassIteratorStatic
  • 8d3151f: 8316002: Remove unnecessary seen_dead_loader in ClassLoaderDataGraph::do_unloading
  • fa5cc58: 8315605: G1: Add number of nmethods in code roots scanning statistics
  • 80cf08a: 8294985: SSLEngine throws IAE during parsing of X500Principal
  • 9e6fb82: 8328592: hprof tests fail with -XX:-CompactStrings
  • 342ae64: 8319876: Reduce memory consumption of VM_ThreadDump::doit
  • ... and 4 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/compare/2800d8bc708f7ccdf32ef64c52f99f40b1459698...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Apr 3, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Apr 3, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Apr 3, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 3, 2024

@GoeLin Pushed as commit c094d7e.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport clean integrated Pull request has been integrated
1 participant