Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8328702: C2: Crash during parsing because sub type check is not folded #450

Closed

Conversation

shipilev
Copy link
Member

@shipilev shipilev commented Apr 4, 2024

Fixes another C2 bug, regression in JDK 21.

Additional testing:

  • New regression test fails without the fix, passes with it
  • Linux x86_64 server fastdebug, all tests pass
  • Linux x86_64 server fastdebug, Fuzzer tests
  • Linux x86_64 server fastdebug, Maven CTW tests

Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • JDK-8328702 needs maintainer approval
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8328702: C2: Crash during parsing because sub type check is not folded (Bug - P2 - Approved)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev.git pull/450/head:pull/450
$ git checkout pull/450

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/450
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev.git pull/450/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 450

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 450

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/450.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Apr 4, 2024

👋 Welcome back shade! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 4, 2024

@shipilev This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8328702: C2: Crash during parsing because sub type check is not folded

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 47 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 6f60957: 8328037: Test java/util/Formatter/Padding.java has unnecessary high heap requirement after JDK-8326718
  • c254aff: 8321718: ProcessTools.executeProcess calls waitFor before logging
  • 38a2173: 8318585: Rename CodeCache::UnloadingScope to UnlinkingScope
  • e0d2248: 8311881: jdk/javax/swing/ProgressMonitor/ProgressTest.java does not show the ProgressMonitorInputStream all the time
  • 8173c64: 8329570: G1: Excessive is_obj_dead_cond calls in verification
  • e95e6fe: 8305645: System Tray icons get corrupted when Windows primary monitor changes
  • 88abc6a: 8328604: remove on_aix() function
  • fd50739: 8315652: RISC-V: Features string uses wrong separator for jtreg
  • d5f44dc: 8319650: Improve heap dump performance with class metadata caching
  • b9ca253: 8325203: System.exit(0) kills the launched 3rd party application
  • ... and 37 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/compare/2800d8bc708f7ccdf32ef64c52f99f40b1459698...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title Backport e5e21a8a6e64466f9cda2064aa2723a15d4ae86a 8328702: C2: Crash during parsing because sub type check is not folded Apr 4, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 4, 2024

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

@shipilev shipilev marked this pull request as ready for review April 5, 2024 06:26
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 5, 2024

⚠️ @shipilev This change is now ready for you to apply for maintainer approval. This can be done directly in each associated issue or by using the /approval command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Apr 5, 2024
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Apr 5, 2024

Webrevs

@shipilev
Copy link
Member Author

shipilev commented Apr 8, 2024

/approval request Fixes another C2 bug, regression in JDK 21. Usual risk for C2 changes, but the fix looks simple enough. Passes all tests, including the aggressive compiler testing. New regression test fails without the fix, passes with it.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 8, 2024

@shipilev
8328702: The approval request has been created successfully.

@openjdk openjdk bot added approval ready Pull request is ready to be integrated and removed approval labels Apr 8, 2024
@shipilev
Copy link
Member Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 10, 2024

Going to push as commit 249d896.
Since your change was applied there have been 47 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 6f60957: 8328037: Test java/util/Formatter/Padding.java has unnecessary high heap requirement after JDK-8326718
  • c254aff: 8321718: ProcessTools.executeProcess calls waitFor before logging
  • 38a2173: 8318585: Rename CodeCache::UnloadingScope to UnlinkingScope
  • e0d2248: 8311881: jdk/javax/swing/ProgressMonitor/ProgressTest.java does not show the ProgressMonitorInputStream all the time
  • 8173c64: 8329570: G1: Excessive is_obj_dead_cond calls in verification
  • e95e6fe: 8305645: System Tray icons get corrupted when Windows primary monitor changes
  • 88abc6a: 8328604: remove on_aix() function
  • fd50739: 8315652: RISC-V: Features string uses wrong separator for jtreg
  • d5f44dc: 8319650: Improve heap dump performance with class metadata caching
  • b9ca253: 8325203: System.exit(0) kills the launched 3rd party application
  • ... and 37 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/compare/2800d8bc708f7ccdf32ef64c52f99f40b1459698...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Apr 10, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Apr 10, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Apr 10, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 10, 2024

@shipilev Pushed as commit 249d896.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport clean integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant