-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 92
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8326936: RISC-V: Shenandoah GC crashes due to incorrect atomic memory operations #507
Conversation
…ic memory operations
…_SUPPORT in atomic_linux_riscv.hpp
👋 Welcome back gcao! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
@zifeihan This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been no new commits pushed to the As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@RealFYang) but any other Committer may sponsor as well. ➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type |
This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit. |
/issue add 8316186, 8330242 |
@zifeihan Adding additional issue to issue list: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM. Thanks.
|
@RealFYang : Thanks for the review. |
/sponsor |
/integrate |
Bots seem to be stuck, huh? I wrote to |
Going to push as commit f0f2e70. |
@RealFYang @zifeihan Pushed as commit f0f2e70. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
@zifeihan The command |
The same issue reproduces for 17u and 21u too if we apply fix for JDK- 8316186 and JDK-8316893 which are both code cleanup/enhancement. So I suggest we backport JDK-8326936 and its followup fix JDK-8330242 to be safe.
Testing
Progress
Issues
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev.git pull/507/head:pull/507
$ git checkout pull/507
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/507
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev.git pull/507/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 507
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 507
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/507.diff
Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment