Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8326201: [S390] Need to bailout cleanly if creation of stubs fails when code cache is out of space #549

Conversation

offamitkumar
Copy link
Member

@offamitkumar offamitkumar commented May 3, 2024

Hi all,

This pull request contains a backport of commit d5f3d5c8 from the openjdk/jdk repository.

The commit being backported was authored by Amit Kumar on 21 Feb 2024 and was reviewed by Lutz Schmidt and Martin Doerr.

Thanks!


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • JDK-8326201 needs maintainer approval

Issue

  • JDK-8326201: [S390] Need to bailout cleanly if creation of stubs fails when code cache is out of space (Bug - P3 - Approved)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev.git pull/549/head:pull/549
$ git checkout pull/549

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/549
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev.git pull/549/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 549

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 549

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/549.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented May 3, 2024

👋 Welcome back amitkumar! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 3, 2024

@offamitkumar This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8326201: [S390] Need to bailout cleanly if creation of stubs fails when code cache is out of space

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 3 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 3bb8eee: 8317809: Insertion of free code blobs into code cache can be very slow during class unloading
  • a4d8d06: 8328744: Parallel: Parallel GC throws OOM before heap is fully expanded
  • 87d5da4: 8328822: C2: "negative trip count?" assert failure in profile predicate code

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change.

➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type /integrate in a new comment. (Afterwards, your sponsor types /sponsor in a new comment to perform the integration).

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title Backport d5f3d5c8cc347ae384dea25b1a55ed57204d1af3 8326201: [S390] Need to bailout cleanly if creation of stubs fails when code cache is out of space May 3, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 3, 2024

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

@offamitkumar offamitkumar marked this pull request as ready for review May 3, 2024 05:47
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 3, 2024

⚠️ @offamitkumar This change is now ready for you to apply for maintainer approval. This can be done directly in each associated issue or by using the /approval command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label May 3, 2024
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented May 3, 2024

Webrevs

@offamitkumar
Copy link
Member Author

/approval request JDK 21 is affected by this bug. The fix is small, only touches two s390x files and applies cleanly. The fix has been tested in head for some time and I have done tier1 testing in jdk21u-dev as well. No new failure appeared.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 3, 2024

@offamitkumar
8326201: The approval request has been created successfully.

@openjdk openjdk bot added approval ready Pull request is ready to be integrated and removed approval labels May 3, 2024
@offamitkumar
Copy link
Member Author

/integrate

@openjdk openjdk bot added the sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored label May 4, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 4, 2024

@offamitkumar
Your change (at version d810577) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

@offamitkumar
Copy link
Member Author

@RealLucy please sponsor 🙂

@shipilev
Copy link
Member

shipilev commented May 6, 2024

/sponsor

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 6, 2024

Going to push as commit abbad92.
Since your change was applied there have been 7 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 3770c28: 8331331: :tier1 target explanation in doc/testing.md is incorrect
  • 021372c: 8328703: Illegal accesses in Java_jdk_internal_org_jline_terminal_impl_jna_linux_CLibraryImpl_ioctl0
  • d459ae9: 8329850: [AIX] Allow loading of different members of same shared library archive
  • 835d016: 8330094: RISC-V: Save and restore FRM in the call stub
  • 3bb8eee: 8317809: Insertion of free code blobs into code cache can be very slow during class unloading
  • a4d8d06: 8328744: Parallel: Parallel GC throws OOM before heap is fully expanded
  • 87d5da4: 8328822: C2: "negative trip count?" assert failure in profile predicate code

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label May 6, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this May 6, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored labels May 6, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 6, 2024

@shipilev @offamitkumar Pushed as commit abbad92.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport clean integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants