-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 95
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8326201: [S390] Need to bailout cleanly if creation of stubs fails when code cache is out of space #549
8326201: [S390] Need to bailout cleanly if creation of stubs fails when code cache is out of space #549
Conversation
👋 Welcome back amitkumar! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
@offamitkumar This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 3 new commits pushed to the
Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. ➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type |
This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit. |
|
/approval request JDK 21 is affected by this bug. The fix is small, only touches two s390x files and applies cleanly. The fix has been tested in head for some time and I have done tier1 testing in jdk21u-dev as well. No new failure appeared. |
@offamitkumar |
/integrate |
@offamitkumar |
@RealLucy please sponsor 🙂 |
/sponsor |
Going to push as commit abbad92.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
@shipilev @offamitkumar Pushed as commit abbad92. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
Hi all,
This pull request contains a backport of commit d5f3d5c8 from the openjdk/jdk repository.
The commit being backported was authored by Amit Kumar on 21 Feb 2024 and was reviewed by Lutz Schmidt and Martin Doerr.
Thanks!
Progress
Issue
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev.git pull/549/head:pull/549
$ git checkout pull/549
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/549
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev.git pull/549/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 549
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 549
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/549.diff
Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment