-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 92
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8330027: Identity hashes of archived objects must be based on a reproducible random seed #562
Conversation
…ducible random seed Reviewed-by: ccheung, iklam
👋 Welcome back stuefe! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
@tstuefe This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 113 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit. |
Webrevs
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM. I suggest removing the empty line, too.
|
Thanks @TheRealMDoerr ! |
/approval I would like to fix this in JDK 21, since it is important for our reproducible-build effort. Risk: A part of this patch is that we don't pro-actively create ihashes anymore during archival dump. I don't think that can cause any problem, nor does Ioi Lam who proposed that, but just to be aware - it may cause subtle changes in CDS dumps. The upstream patch has been in 23 for several weeks now, without any problems floating up. |
@tstuefe usage: |
@tstuefe: The approval command was wrong. Please take a look. |
/approval request I would like to fix this in JDK 21, since it is important for our reproducible-build effort. |
/integrate |
Going to push as commit 75287b5.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
This fixes an issue with CDS archive reproducibility that can happen under rare circumstances. See original JBS issue for details.
I had to manually resolve the hunk in src/hotspot/share/cds/heapShared.cpp because both
I also had to change
CDSConfig::is_dumping_static_archive()
- which only exists in JDK 22 and later - to the technically equalDumpSharedSpaces
.Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev.git pull/562/head:pull/562
$ git checkout pull/562
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/562
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev.git pull/562/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 562
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 562
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/562.diff
Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment