Skip to content

Conversation

@ArsenyBochkarev
Copy link

@ArsenyBochkarev ArsenyBochkarev commented Dec 20, 2023

Fix for initial implementation of _poly1305_processBlocks. JBS issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8320564


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • JDK-8320564 needs maintainer approval

Integration blocker

 ⚠️ Dependency #77 must be integrated first

Issue

  • JDK-8320564: RISC-V: Minimal build failed after JDK-8316592 (Bug - P3)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev.git pull/78/head:pull/78
$ git checkout pull/78

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/78
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev.git pull/78/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 78

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 78

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/78.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Dec 20, 2023

👋 Welcome back ArsenyBochkarev! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into pr/77 will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title Backport 864b39a89398731bfde9af10c3d7797ff5d05760 8320564: RISC-V: Minimal build failed after JDK-8316592 Dec 20, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 20, 2023

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

@openjdk openjdk bot added backport Port of a pull request already in a different code base clean Identical backport; no merge resolution required rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Dec 20, 2023
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Dec 20, 2023

Webrevs

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jan 17, 2024

@ArsenyBochkarev This pull request has been inactive for more than 4 weeks and will be automatically closed if another 4 weeks passes without any activity. To avoid this, simply add a new comment to the pull request. Feel free to ask for assistance if you need help with progressing this pull request towards integration!

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Feb 14, 2024

@ArsenyBochkarev This pull request has been inactive for more than 8 weeks and will now be automatically closed. If you would like to continue working on this pull request in the future, feel free to reopen it! This can be done using the /open pull request command.

@bridgekeeper bridgekeeper bot closed this Feb 14, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

backport Port of a pull request already in a different code base clean Identical backport; no merge resolution required rfr Pull request is ready for review

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant